• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Econometrics and Financial Management >Ponzi of All Ponzis: Critical Analysis of the Bernie Madoff Scheme
【24h】

Ponzi of All Ponzis: Critical Analysis of the Bernie Madoff Scheme

机译：所有庞氏骗局的庞氏骗局：伯尼·麦道夫计划的批判性分析

获取原文
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Bernie Madoff perpetrated the largest Ponzi scheme in American history, by utilizing a fraud methodology that dates back to the mid 1800s. Madoff was able to steal roughly $65 billion dollars, during the course of multiple decades. Due to the elaborate nature of the fraud and the reputable public perception of Madoff, the scheme not only went uncovered after multiple Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) tips and pre-investigations, but also continued to grow and increase in popularity, among investors worldwide. The SEC conducted haphazard investigations and utilized inexperienced examiners that lacked support and guidance from senior leaders. The SEC also had understaffed personnel, which kept over-worked investigators from thoroughly examining Madoff’s network. In this research paper, the author provides a critical analysis of the entire incident and also broadens the discussion to capture lessons learned, while extrapolating the details to consider fraud prevention techniques that can be used by organizations of all sizes, in multiple industries. The author offers recommendations to investors to reduce the potential of falling victim to future Ponzi schemes and/or other fraudulent behavior in corporate settings. The research includes recommendations for investigators so they are prepared to quickly discover and eliminate Ponzi schemes and other fraudulent activities, while mitigating losses. Lastly, insight into the reform and modifications that have occurred within the SEC as a result of the Madoff Ponzi scheme will be reviewed.
机译：伯尼·麦道夫（Bernie Madoff）利用可追溯到1800年代中期的欺诈方法，实施了美国历史上最大的庞氏骗局。在几十年的时间里，麦道夫窃取了大约650亿美元。由于欺诈行为的复杂性和公众对Madoff的认可，该计划不仅在经过美国证券交易委员会（SEC）的多次提示和预先调查后才被发现，而且在全球投资者中持续增长并越来越受欢迎。 SEC进行了偶然性调查，并使用了经验丰富的审查员，这些审查员缺乏高级领导的支持和指导。 SEC的人员也不足，这使工作过度的调查人员无法彻底检查Madoff的网络。在这篇研究论文中，作者对整个事件进行了批判性分析，并扩大了讨论范围，以吸取经验教训，同时推断出细节以考虑可被多个行业的各种规模的组织使用的欺诈预防技术。作者向投资者提供建议，以减少潜在的未来庞氏骗局和/或公司环境中其他欺诈行为的受害者。该研究包括对调查人员的建议，以便他们准备快速发现并消除庞氏骗局和其他欺诈活动，同时减轻损失。最后，将审查对由于Madoff Ponzi计划而在SEC内部进行的改革和修改的见解。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号