...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health >Gain-Framed Messages Do Not Motivate Sun Protection: A Meta-Analytic Review of Randomized Trials Comparing Gain-Framed and Loss-Framed Appeals for Promoting Skin Cancer Prevention
【24h】

Gain-Framed Messages Do Not Motivate Sun Protection: A Meta-Analytic Review of Randomized Trials Comparing Gain-Framed and Loss-Framed Appeals for Promoting Skin Cancer Prevention

机译：获利框架的消息无助于防晒：对获利框架和失范框架呼吁进行皮肤癌预防比较的随机试验的荟萃分析综述

获取原文
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Persuading people to undertake actions to prevent skin cancer is an important public health challenge. A number of studies have compared the effectiveness of gain-framed and loss-framed appeals in this domain, often expecting gain-framed appeals to be more persuasive. A meta-analytic review (k = 33, N = 4,168), however, finds no significant difference in the persuasiveness of gain- and loss-framed appeals for encouraging skin cancer prevention. This conclusion is unaffected by differences in the specific protective action advocated or by differences in the kind of outcomes invoked. But the results offer an intimation that men might be more susceptible to framing variations in this domain—with loss-framed appeals potentially having a persuasive advantage.
机译：说服人们采取预防皮肤癌的措施是一项重要的公共卫生挑战。许多研究已经比较了以收益为框架和以损失为框架的上诉在此领域的有效性，通常期望以收益为框架的上诉更具说服力。然而，一项荟萃分析综述（k = 33，N = 4,168）发现，在有利于预防皮肤癌的有损框框和受框框框框的呼吁的说服力方面没有显着差异。该结论不受所倡导的具体保护措施的差异或所引用结果的差异的影响。但是结果表明，男人可能更容易受到此领域的框架变化的影响，而带有框框的上诉可能具有说服力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号