• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Science and Applied Science: Conference Series >The Comparison of Think Talk Write and Think Pair Share Model with Realistic Mathematics Education Approach Viewed from Mathematical-Logical Intelligence
【24h】

The Comparison of Think Talk Write and Think Pair Share Model with Realistic Mathematics Education Approach Viewed from Mathematical-Logical Intelligence

机译：从数学逻辑智能看思维写和思维对共享模型与现实数学教育方法的比较

获取原文
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The aims of this research to determine the effect of Think Talk Write (TTW) and Think Pair Share (TPS) model with Realistic Mathematics Education (RME) approach viewed from mathematical-logical intelligence. This research employed the quasi experimental research. The population of research was all students of the eight graders of junior high school in Karangamyar Regency in academic year 2016/2017. The result of this research shows that (1) TTW with RME approach gave better mathematics achievement than TPS with RME approach, (2) Students with high mathematical-logical intelligence can reach a better mathematics achievement than those with average and low, whereas students with average mathematical-logical intelligence can reach a better achievement than those with low one, (3) In TTW model with RME approach, students with high mathematical-logical intelligence can reach a better mathematics achievement than those with average and low, whereas students with average and low mathematical-logical intelligence gave same mathematics achievement, and? in TPS model with RME approach students with high mathematical-logical intelligence can reach a better mathematics achievement than those with average and low, whereas students with average mathematical-logical intelligence can reach a better achievement than those with low one (4) In each category of? mathematical-logical intelligence, TTW with RME approach and TPS with RME approach gave same mathematics achievement.
机译：这项研究的目的是确定从数学逻辑智能角度出发，采用写实数学教育（RME）方法确定思考谈话写作（TTW）和思考对共享（TPS）模型的效果。本研究采用了准实验研究。研究人群是2016/2017学年Karangamyar摄政中学八年级的所有学生。研究结果表明：（1）RTW方法的TTW的数学成绩比RME方法的TPS更好;（2）具有高数学智能的学生比具有中等水平和低水平的学生可以获得更高的数学成绩。平均数理智力的学生可以获得比低数智力学生更好的成绩，（3）在采用RME方法的TTW模型中，数理智力较高的学生可以比平均数和低水平的学生获得更好的数学成绩。和较低的数理智能给出了相同的数学成就，并且？在采用RME方法的TPS模型中，具有较高数学智能的学生比具有中等和低水平的学生可以获得更好的数学成绩，而具有较高数学智能的学生可以比具有较低和较低的学生获得更好的成绩（4）的？数学逻辑智能，采用RME方法的TTW和采用RME方法的TPS给出了相同的数学成就。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号