• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>European Journal of Management and Business Economics >The contribution of tangible and intangible resources, and capabilities to a firm’s profitability and market performance
【24h】

The contribution of tangible and intangible resources, and capabilities to a firm’s profitability and market performance

机译：有形和无形资源以及能力对公司的盈利能力和市场绩效的贡献

获取原文
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Purpose The Purpose of this paper is to investigate the relative contribution of tangible resource (TR) and intangible resource (IR), and capabilities on firm performance based on the measures of market share, sales turnover and profitability.Design/methodology/approachA cross-sectional survey research design was used in the study. The modified version of Galbreath and Galvin’s (2008) resource-performance questionnaire which included a total number of 45 questions was applied on 243 Turkish firms operating in different industries. The data collected were analysed by hierarchical regression analysis.FindingsThe findings revealed that IRs and capabilities contributed more greatly to firm performance compared to TRs. However, in contrast to the proposition of resource-based theory that views capabilities as the most important skills that underpin the development and deployment of both TR and IR, capabilities offered rather limited additional explanatory power to the prediction of firm performance only with respect to profitability against the combined effects of TR and IR.Originality/valueThe vast majority of the empirical resource-based view (RBV) research concentrates on developed countries and very little is known about results outside of this domain. This study employs Turkish business databases to assess the relative importance of TR and IR and capabilities on performance differences among firms in Turkey which was the 17th largest economy in the world trade in 2016. Second, in the RBV literature, limited research tests the contribution of capabilities to firm success after simultaneously accounting for the effects of other resources (namely, TR and IR) available to the firm. Finally, this research offers practical contributions to executives and managers who have to make adequate decisions for firm survival and growth in the competitive business arena.
机译：目的本文的目的是基于市场份额，销售营业额和获利能力的指标，研究有形资源（TR）和无形资源（IR）的相对贡献以及对公司绩效的能力。设计/方法/方法在研究中使用了分区调查研究设计。 Galbreath和Galvin（2008）的资源绩效调查表的修改版对总共243家从事不同行业的土耳其公司进行了问卷调查，其中包括总共45个问题。通过分层回归分析对收集的数据进行分析。结果发现，与TR相比，IR和能力对公司绩效的贡献更大。但是，与资源基础理论的主张相反，资源理论认为能力是支撑TR和IR的开发和部署的最重要技能，而能力仅在盈利方面提供了有限的解释力来预测公司绩效反对TR和IR的综合影响。原创性/价值绝大多数基于经验资源的观点（RBV）研究都集中在发达国家，而对该领域以外的研究成果知之甚少。这项研究利用土耳其商业数据库评估了TR和IR的相对重要性以及土耳其公司之间绩效差异的能力，土耳其是2016年世界贸易中的第17大经济体。第二，在RBV文献中，有限的研究测试了同时考虑到公司可用的其他资源（即TR和IR）的影响之后的公司成功的能力。最后，这项研究为必须在竞争激烈的商业舞台上为企业生存和发展做出充分决策的高管和经理提供了实用的帮助。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号