...
首页> 外文期刊>Research Journal of Finance and Accounting >Regulation in Business Valuation: The Case of the International Valuation Standards Council
【24h】

Regulation in Business Valuation: The Case of the International Valuation Standards Council

机译:企业评估中的法规:以国际评估标准委员会为例

获取原文
           

摘要

This paper calls attention to the theme of standardization in business valuation which is still a neglected area of research in the scientific community, differently from what happens with regard to the standardization of financial reporting. The issue, in truth, deserves attention because high quality best practices applied by the global valuation profession has effects on the efficiency of the entire economic system, in other words on the public interest. The aim of the paper is to analyse the state of the art of International Valuation Standards (IVS) issued by the International Valuation Standards Council (IVSC), an independent international institution that has the purpose of setting international standards and also of promoting and developing quality professional practices.The study is conducted in the light of an interpretative model that identifies three critical variables: the regulated matter, the regulation strategy, and the regulation system. From the analysis emerges that the International Valuation Standards” (IVS) are by no means comparable to national or international accounting standards (IAS/IFRS and US GAAP) either by extent or by depth of regulation. In particular IVS devote greater attention towards procedural and formal issues rather than towards content issues. They represent only a set of minimum requirements that experts are required to respect, so the subjective nature of business valuation is of particular relevance.
机译:本文提请注意业务评估中的标准化主题,这仍然是科学界研究的一个被忽视的领域,与财务报告标准化有关。实际上,这个问题值得关注,因为全球估值专业所采用的高质量最佳实践会影响整个经济体系的效率,换句话说,会影响公共利益。本文旨在分析国际评估标准委员会(IVSC)发布的国际评估标准(IVS)的最新水平,该委员会是一个旨在制定国际标准并促进和发展质量的独立国际机构本研究是根据一个解释模型进行的,该模型确定了三个关键变量:被管制物质,管制策略和管制系统。从分析中可以看出,无论在范围还是深度上,《国际评估准则》(IVS)都无法与国家或国际会计准则(IAS / IFRS和US GAAP)相提并论。特别是,IVS更加关注程序和形式问题,而不是内容问题。它们仅代表专家必须遵守的一组最低要求,因此,业务评估的主观性特别重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号