...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Social Sciences >Who Owns Child Abuse?
【24h】

Who Owns Child Abuse?

机译：谁拥有虐待儿童的责任？

获取原文
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Expectations of contemporary child protection apparatuses are strongly influenced by beliefs inherited from the nineteenth century child rescue movement. In particular, the belief that child abuse determination is obvious. However, this assumption fails to make a distinction between nineteenth century’s emphasis on impoverished environments and the twentieth century introduction of the pathological child abuser. Moreover, the proliferation of kinds of child abuse, and the need to distinguish child abusers from non-abusers, means knowledge is now spread across an array of disciplines and professions, which necessarily destabilizes the definition of child abuse. The increasing exposure of alternate care systems as potentially abusive has similarly destabilized the old common sense solution to neglected children—namely removal. Finally, as uncertainty increases, and definitions become more divergent, the question of what child abuse is, and what should be done about it, becomes increasingly politicized.
机译：当代儿童保护设备的期望受到19世纪儿童营救运动传承的信念的强烈影响。特别是，确定虐待儿童的信念是显而易见的。但是，这种假设无法区分19世纪对贫困环境的重视与20世纪引入病理性虐待儿童者。此外，虐待儿童的种类激增，以及需要将虐待儿童者与非虐待儿童区分开来，这意味着知识现在散布在各种学科和专业中，这必然使虐待儿童的定义不稳定。替代照料系统越来越多地被潜在滥用，这同样使旧常识性解决方案对被忽视的儿童（即搬离）的稳定。最后，随着不确定性的增加和定义的分歧越来越大，关于虐待儿童是什么以及应如何处理的问题变得越来越政治化。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号