首页> 外文期刊>Sustainability >The Effect of Payments for Ecosystem Services Programs on the Relationship of Livelihood Capital and Livelihood Strategy among Rural Communities in Northwestern China
【24h】

The Effect of Payments for Ecosystem Services Programs on the Relationship of Livelihood Capital and Livelihood Strategy among Rural Communities in Northwestern China

机译:生态系统服务付费对西北农村社区民生资本与民生战略关系的影响

获取原文
           

摘要

The security and quality of livelihoods for peasant households is the core issue for rural areas in China. A stable livelihood contributes to the harmonious development of related polices, poverty eradication and sustainable use of resources. In Qinghe County, located in the extremely arid zone of Northwest China, 238 validated surveys were conducted. The analysis focuses on the importance of livelihood capitals for the selection of on- or off-farm livelihood strategies among beneficiaries of different kinds of ecological compensation packages. The goal is to see if different groups of beneficiaries are better able to pursue off-farm livelihoods activity, which reduces pressure on the resource base, and whether specific capitals are especially effective in helping households pursue off-farm livelihoods, which benefits their well-being. The findings show that proportionally more herdsmen (who participated in a pastureland rehabilitation program) were able to pursue off-farm livelihoods than farmers (who participated in the cultivated land reforestation program), and especially agro-pastoralists (who participated in both programs). Further, models of livelihood strategy show that human and financial capitals facilitate off-farm livelihoods, while productive capital tends to lead to on-farm livelihoods. These findings indicate that there is no single determinant of livelihood strategy, and future policies must consciously differentiate among beneficiaries to reach the desired result.
机译:农民家庭的生活保障和质量是中国农村地区的核心问题。稳定的生计有助于相关政策的协调发展,消除贫困和资源的可持续利用。在中国西北极端干旱地区的清河县,进行了238次经验证的调查。分析的重点是民生资本对于在不同类型的生态补偿方案的受益人中选择农场内或农场外生计策略的重要性。目的是查看不同的受益人群体是否能够更好地从事非农生计活动,从而减轻资源基础上的压力,以及特定资本是否在帮助家庭从事非农生计方面特别有效,从而使他们的福利受益。存在。研究结果表明,与农民(参与耕地造林计划)相比,从事牧民生计的牧民(参与牧场复垦计划)的比例要高得多,尤其是农牧民(参与这两个计划)的农牧民比例更高。此外,生计战略模型表明,人力资本和金融资本促进了非农业生计,而生产性资本往往导致了农业生计。这些发现表明,没有一个决定民生战略的决定因素,未来的政策必须有意识地区分受益人,以达到预期的结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号