首页> 外文期刊>PLATFORM : Journal of Media and Communication >Editorial – Platforms for the new: Simondon and media studies
【24h】

Editorial – Platforms for the new: Simondon and media studies

机译:社论–新平台:西蒙登和媒体研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Since its inception, the mission of Platform: Journal of Media and Communication has been to provide graduate students and scholars in the early stages of their careers with an outlet for writing and research within the fields of media studies and communication studies. This issue of the journal is guided by these aims, but it also marks a departure from those that precede it. For us, the media gathered under the rubric of "new media" have lost the sheen and the novelty that justified this phrase's exceptionalism and consis- tency as an organizing framework. In our contemporary media situation, this sheen has faded to grey (Fuller and Go.rey, 2012). This begs the question: what are media today if these media are not – or are no longer – new. What meaning can this reference to the "new" have, at a time when the production of tech- nological novelty is a constant. (see Wark 2013; Sutherland 2014). We think that this disseverment of media from the new generates a gap in media and communications studies, separating the latter from their working, vernacular conceptions of their eponymous terms
机译:自成立以来,“平台:媒体与传播杂志”的使命一直是为处于职业生涯早期阶段的研究生和学者提供在媒体研究和传播研究领域进行写作和研究的渠道。本期杂志以这些目标为指导,但也标志着与之前目标的背离。对我们而言,聚集在“新媒体”专栏下的媒体已经失去了光泽和新颖性,这些不足和新颖性证明了该短语作为组织框架的例外和一致性。在我们当今的媒体环境中,这种光泽逐渐淡化为灰色(Fuller和Go.rey,2012年)。这就引出了一个问题:如果这些媒体不是(或不再是)新的,那么今天是什么媒体。在技​​术新颖性不断产生的时代,这种对“新”的指称有什么意义。 (请参阅Wark 2013; Sutherland 2014)。我们认为,媒体与新媒体之间的分离使媒体与传播研究出现了差距,将后者与同名术语的实际白话观念分开

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号