• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Public Policy and Administration Research >Three Eras in Policy Analysis: Review of Radin’s “Beyond Machiavelli: Policy Analysis Reaches Midlife”
【24h】

Three Eras in Policy Analysis: Review of Radin’s “Beyond Machiavelli: Policy Analysis Reaches Midlife”

机译：政策分析的三个时代：对Radin的“超越马基雅维利：政策分析达到中年”的评论

获取原文
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Policy Analysis as a systematized body of knowledge or field of study has been defined in several ways. For example, Mayer, Els van Daalen, and Bots (n.d.) define Policy Analysis as a multi-faceted field in which a variety of different activities and ambitions have found a place; as a broad and versatile field of applied policy research and advice, where a multitude of perspectives and methods have developed. Vaitsman, Lobato, and Ribeiro (2013), state that policy analysis refers to either an interdisciplinary or applied field within the social sciences dealing with all of the activities within a planning system and which provides information for policy decision-makers in administrative and political systems. Policy analysis simply defines the problem and the goals, examines the arguments, and analyzes implementation of the policy regarding issues, usually issues involving the intermingling perspectives, rights, responsibilities and interests of stakeholders. There are many books written on Policy Analysis and the policy process. Among them is a notable reader written by Beryl A. Radin, a faculty in the Georgetown Public Policy Institute and McCourt School of Public Policy at George Washington University. This book is the second in her series chronicling the practice and systematization of Public Policy, and titled, Beyond Machiavelli: Policy Analysis Reaches Midlife (2013), the first being Beyond Machiavelli: Policy Analysis Reaches Midlife (2004). In the work under review, the author provides an overview of Radin’s book and looks at the three fictional persons that Radin develops, and explains how these three persons represent different ways of doing policy analysis. The author also critiques Radin’s model by looking at the strengths and weaknesses of each different approach. In the final analysis, the author deliberates on which model represents the best way to doing policy analysis with an understanding that each has its merits.
机译：政策分析作为知识或研究领域的系统化体系，已经通过多种方式进行了定义。例如，梅耶（Mayer），埃尔斯·范·达伦（Els van Daalen）和博茨（Bots）（未指定）将政策分析定义为一个多方面的领域，在该领域中，各种不同的活动和野心找到了位置;作为应用政策研究和建议的广泛而广泛的领域，已经发展了多种观点和方法。 Vaitsman，Lobato和Ribeiro（2013）指出，政策分析是指社会科学领域的跨学科领域或应用领域，涉及计划系统内的所有活动，并为行政和政治系统中的决策者提供信息。政策分析只是定义问题和目标，检查论点，并分析有关问题的政策实施情况，这些问题通常涉及利益相关者的观点，权利，责任和利益交织在一起。有很多关于策略分析和策略过程的书。其中有一位著名的读者，作者是乔治敦公共政策学院和乔治华盛顿大学麦考特公共政策学院的教师Beryl A. Radin。这本书是她的系列第二本记录公共政策的实践和系统化的系列，标题为《超越马基雅维利：政策分析达到中年》（2013年），第一本书是《超越马基雅维利：政策分析达到中年》（2004年）。在所审查的工作中，作者概述了Radin的书，并介绍了Radin发展起来的三个虚构人物，并解释了这三个人物如何代表不同的进行政策分析的方式。作者还通过考察每种方法的优缺点来批评Radin的模型。在最终的分析中，作者考虑到每个模型都有其优点，然后考虑采用哪种模型代表进行政策分析的最佳方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号