...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>The Internet Journal of Toxicology >Urine Amphetamine Screening, Informed Consent Is Useful Or Useless?
【24h】

Urine Amphetamine Screening, Informed Consent Is Useful Or Useless?

机译：尿苯丙胺筛查，知情同意是有用还是无用？

获取原文
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Amphetamine addiction becomes an important narcotic problem in Thailand. Not only health but also social side effects of amphetamine abuse are well known. Urine screening for amphetamine is now widely used and introduced as one necessary test for narcotics screening. To test the hypothesis that inform consent may be not useful in performing this test, we performed this test on all 40 teenagers after previous asking for informed consent. All screening tests showed negative results. Comparing to the data from the police department in the same period and setting, up to 5 % of positive results can be obtained in forced screenings for urine amphetamine. Hereby, we debate if it is useful to perform this screening test in the clinical laboratory with the principle of informed consent.
机译：苯丙胺成瘾在泰国成为重要的麻醉品问题。不仅健康，而且苯丙胺滥用的社会副作用也是众所周知的。苯丙胺的尿液筛查现已被广泛使用，并作为麻醉品筛查的一项必要测试而引入。为了检验假设知情同意可能对进行这项测试没有用的假设，我们在先前要求知情同意后对所有40名青少年进行了这项测试。所有筛选测试均显示阴性结果。与同期和设置的来自警察部门的数据相比，在强制性筛查尿苯丙胺的情况下，阳性结果的阳性率高达5％。因此，我们讨论在知情同意的原则下在临床实验室中进行此筛查测试是否有用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号