...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Western Journal of Emergency Medicine >Does the Medium Matter? Evaluating the Depth of Reflective Writing by Medical Students on Social Media Compared to the Traditional Private Essay Using the REFLECT Rubric
【24h】

Does the Medium Matter? Evaluating the Depth of Reflective Writing by Medical Students on Social Media Compared to the Traditional Private Essay Using the REFLECT Rubric

机译：中等问题吗？使用REFLECT专栏评估医学生在社交媒体上与传统私人散文相比的反思性写作深度

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Introduction: Social media is a novel medium to host reflective writing (RW) essays, yet its impact on depth of students’ reflection is unknown. Shifting reflection on to social platforms offers opportunities for students to engage with their community, yet may leave them feeling vulnerable and less willing to reflect deeply. Using sociomateriality as a conceptual framework, we aimed to compare the depth of reflection in RW samples submitted by medical students in a traditional private essay format to those posted on a secure social media platform. Methods: Fourth-year medical students submitted a RW essay as part of their emergency medicine clerkship, either in a private essay format (academic year [AY] 2015) or onto a closed, password-protected social media website (AY 2016). Five raters used the Reflection Evaluation for Learners’ Enhanced Competencies Tool (REFLECT) to score 122 de-identified RW samples (55 private, 67 social media). Average scores on two platforms were compared. Students were also surveyed regarding their comfort with the social media experience. Results: There were no differences in average composite REFLECT scores between the private essay (14.1, 95% confidence interval [CI], 12.0-16.2) and social media (13.7 95% CI, 11.4-16.0) submission formats (t [1,120] = 0.94, p = 0.35). Of the 73% of students who responded to the survey, 72% reported feeling comfortable sharing their personal reflections with peers, and 84% felt comfortable commenting on peers’ writing. Conclusion: Students generally felt comfortable using social media for shared reflection. The depth of reflection in RW essays was similar between the private and social media submission formats.
机译：简介：社交媒体是主持反思写作（RW）论文的一种新颖媒体，但它对学生反思深度的影响尚不清楚。将反思转移到社交平台上为学生提供了与社区互动的机会，但可能会使他们感到脆弱并且不愿进行深入反思。我们以社会物质性为概念框架，旨在比较医学生以传统的私人论文格式提交的RW样本与在安全的社交媒体平台上发布的RW样本的反思深度。方法：作为四年级医学生的四年级医学生，他们以私人论文形式（学术年[AY] 2015）或封闭的，受密码保护的社交媒体网站（AY 2016）提交了RW论文作为其紧急医学业务的一部分。五名评分者使用“学习者的增强能力反思评估工具（REFLECT）”对122个未识别的RW样本评分（55个私有，67个社交媒体）。比较了两个平台上的平均分数。还对学生进行了社交媒体体验方面的舒适度调查。结果：私人论文（14.1，95％置信区间[CI]，12.0-16.2）和社交媒体（13.7 95％CI，11.4-16.0）提交格式（t [1,120]）之间的平均综合REFLECT分数没有差异。 = 0.94，p = 0.35）。在接受调查的73％的学生中，有72％的人表示愿意与同龄人分享自己的个人看法，而84％的人认为对同writing的写作发表评论很舒服。结论：学生们通常对使用社交媒体进行共同反思感到满意。在私人和社交媒体提交格式之间，RW文章的反思深度相似。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号