• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Dental Journal: Majalah Kedokteran Gigi >Contrasting efficacy of cocoa POD HUSK extract and 8% propolis extract in maintaining of root canal wall cleanliness
【24h】

Contrasting efficacy of cocoa POD HUSK extract and 8% propolis extract in maintaining of root canal wall cleanliness

机译：可可POD壳提取物和8％蜂胶提取物在维持根管壁清洁度方面的对比功效

获取原文
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Background: The existence of the smear layer, which can be produced during root canal instrumentation, may compromise the bond between filling material and the root canal walls. Therefore, the use of an effective root canal irrigation solution, a commonly employed form of which is sodium hypochloride (NaOCl), is important. Sodium hypochloride has several positive properties including effectiveness as a disinfectant agent and its ability to promote tissue-dissolution, although it is ineffective at cleaning the smear layer. There have been numerous recent studies of the application of phytomedicines in endodontics due to their advantages such as minimum toxicity and cost effectiveness. The saponin contained in both the propolis and cocoa pod husk acts as a surfactant that may lower surface tension and dissolve debris containing organic and anorganic materials. Purpose: The study aimed to provide evidence of the differences between root canal wall cleanliness when treated with 8% propolis extract and different concentrations of cocoa pod husk extract. Methods: 25 extracted teeth with single straight root canals were randomly divided into five categories (n=5). Sample preparation was performed using a rotary file and irrigated with different solutions. The first group was administered 2.5% NaOCl, the second group 8% propolis, the third group 3.12% cocoa pod husk extract, the fourth group 6.25% cocoa pod husk extract, and the fifth group 12.50% cocoa pod husk extract. The samples were then dissected into two sections at the apical third and their cleanliness scores subjected to a Mann-Whitney test with a significance level of p=0.05. Results: A significant difference was identified between all groups (p0.05) and on the median control test, the highest value of 1.6 was recorded by the 6.25% cocoa pod husk extract, compared to the other four groups Conclusion: Cocoa pod husk extract demonstrates greater efficacy at cleaning root canal walls compared to 8% propolis extract.
机译：背景：涂片层的存在可能会在根管置入过程中产生，可能会损害填充材料与根管壁之间的结合。因此，重要的是使用有效的根管冲洗液，其常用形式为次氯酸钠（NaOCl）。次氯酸钠具有几种积极的特性，包括作为消毒剂的有效性及其促进组织溶解的能力，尽管它在清洁涂片层方面无效。由于植物药的优点，例如毒性最小和成本低廉，最近在植物学中进行了许多研究。蜂胶和可可荚果皮中都含有的皂苷可作为表面活性剂，可降低表面张力并溶解含有机物和无机物的碎屑。目的：该研究旨在提供证据，证明用8％蜂胶提取物和不同浓度的可可荚果皮提取物处理后的根管壁清洁度之间存在差异。方法：将25条单根直根拔牙随机分为5类（n = 5）。使用旋转锉进行样品制备，并用不同的溶液灌溉。第一组服用2.5％NaOCl，第二组服用8％蜂胶，第三组服用3.12％可可荚果皮提取物，第四组服用6.25％可可荚果皮提取物，第五组服用12.50％可可荚果皮提取物。然后将样品在第三个顶端切成两部分，并对其清洁度进行Mann-Whitney检验，显着性水平为p = 0.05。结果：所有组之间均存在显着差异（p <0.05），中值对照测试中，6.25％的可可豆荚皮提取物记录的最高值为1.6，而其他四组则为结论。与8％的蜂胶提取物相比，具有更大的清洁根管壁的功效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号