• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of athletic training >The Size and Scope of Collegiate Athletic Training Facilities and Staffing
【24h】

The Size and Scope of Collegiate Athletic Training Facilities and Staffing

机译：高校运动训练设施及人员配备的规模和范围

获取原文
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Athletic training facilities have been described in terms of general design concepts and from operational perspectives. However, the size and scope of athletic training facilities, along with staffing at different levels of intercollegiate competition, have not been quantified. To define the size and scope of athletic training facilities and staffing levels at various levels of intercollegiate competition. To determine if differences existed in facilities (eg, number of facilities, size of facilities) and staffing (eg, full time, part time) based on the level of intercollegiate competition. Design: Cross-sectional study. Setting: Web-based survey. Patients or Other Participants: Athletic trainers (ATs) who were knowledgeable about the size and scope of athletic training programs. Main Outcome Measure(s): Athletic training facility size in square footage; the AT's overall facility satisfaction; athletic training facility component spaces, including satellite facilities, game-day facilities, offices, and storage areas; and staffing levels, including full-time ATs, part-time ATs, and undergraduate students. Results: The survey was completed by 478 ATs (response rate = 38.7%) from all levels of competition. Sample means for facilities were 3124.7 ± 4425 ft2 (290.3 ± 411 m2) for the central athletic training facility, 1013 ± 1521 ft2 (94 ± 141 m2) for satellite athletic training facilities, 1272 ± 1334 ft2 (118 ± 124 m2) for game-day athletic training facilities, 388 ± 575 ft2 (36 ± 53 m2) for athletic training offices, and 424 ± 884 ft2 (39 ± 82 m2) for storage space. Sample staffing means were 3.8 ± 2.5 full-time ATs, 1.6 ± 2.5 part-time ATs, 25 ± 17.6 athletic training students, and 6.8 ± 7.2 work-study students. Division I schools had greater resources in multiple categories (P < .001). Differences among other levels of competition were not as well defined. Expansion or renovation of facilities in recent years was common, and almost half of ATs reported that upgrades have been approved for the near future. Conclusions: This study provides benchmark descriptive data on athletic training staffing and facilities. The results (1) suggest that the ATs were satisfied with their facilities and (2) highlight the differences in resources among competition levels.
机译：已经从一般设计概念和操作角度描述了运动训练设施。但是，运动训练设施的规模和范围，以及大学间竞争水平不同的人员配备，尚未得到量化。定义大学间比赛各个级别的运动训练设施的规模和范围以及人员配备水平。根据学院间竞争的水平，确定设施（例如设施数量，设施规模）和人员配备（例如全职，兼职）是否存在差异。设计：横断面研究。设置：基于Web的调查。患者或其他参与者：了解运动训练计划的规模和范围的运动训练者（AT）。主要成果指标：运动训练设施的面积（平方英尺）; AT的整体设施满意度;运动训练设施的组成空间，包括卫星设施，比赛日设施，办公室和储藏区;和人员级别，包括全职AT，兼职AT和本科生。结果：这项调查由来自各个级别比赛的478个AT（完成率为38.7％）完成。设施的样本平均值为：中央体育训练设施为3124.7±4425平方英尺（290.3±411平方米），卫星体育训练设施为1013±1521平方英尺（94±141平方米），比赛为1272±1334平方英尺（118±124平方米）天运动训练设施，用于运动训练办公室的空间为388±575平方英尺（36±53平方米），用于存储空间的空间为424±884平方英尺（39±82平方米）。样本人员配备方式为3.8±2.5全职AT，1.6±2.5兼职AT，25±17.6运动训练学生和6.8±7.2勤工俭学学生。 I部门的学校在多个类别中拥有更多的资源（P <.001）。其他竞争水平之间的差异没有很好地定义。近年来，设施的扩展或翻新很普遍，几乎一半的AT都报告说在不久的将来已经批准了升级。结论：本研究提供了有关运动训练人员和设施的基准描述性数据。结果（1）表明AT对其设施感到满意，并且（2）强调了竞争水平之间资源的差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号