首页> 外文期刊>Journal of athletic training >Two Different Fatigue Protocols and Lower Extremity Motion Patterns During a Stop-Jump Task
【24h】

Two Different Fatigue Protocols and Lower Extremity Motion Patterns During a Stop-Jump Task

机译:跳跳任务过程中的两种不同的疲劳协议和下肢运动模式

获取原文
           

摘要

Context: Altered neuromuscular control strategies during fatigue probably contribute to the increased incidence of non-contact anterior cruciate ligament injuries in female athletes. Objective: To determine biomechanical differences between 2 fatigue protocols (slow linear oxidative fatigue protocol [SLO-FP] and functional agility short-term fatigue protocol [FAST-FP]) when performing a running-stop-jump task. Design: Controlled laboratory study. Setting: Laboratory. Patients or Other Participants: A convenience sample of 15 female soccer players (age = 19.2 ±0.8 years, height = 1.67±0.05m, mass = 61.7 + 8.1 kg) without injury participated. Intervention(s): Five successful trials of a running–stop-jump task were obtained prefatigue and postfatigue during the 2 protocols. For the SLO-FP, a peak oxygen consumption (V˙o2peak) test was conducted before the fatigue protocol. Five minutes after the conclusion of the V˙o2peak test, participants started the fatigue protocol by performing a 30-minute interval run. The FAST-FP consisted of 4 sets of a functional circuit. Repeated 2 (fatigue protocol) × 2 (time) analyses of variance were conducted to assess differences between the 2 protocols and time (prefatigue, postfatigue). Main Outcome Measure(s): Kinematic and kinetic measures of the hip and knee were obtained at different times while participants performed both protocols during prefatigue and postfatigue. Results: Internal adduction moment at initial contact (IC) was greater during FAST-FP (0.064 ±0.09 Nm/kgm) than SLO-FP (0.024±0.06 Nm/kgm) (F1,14 = 5.610, P=.03). At IC, participants had less hip flexion postfatigue (44.7°±8.1°) than prefatigue (50.1°±9.5°) (F1,14 = 16.229, P=.001). At peak vertical ground reaction force, participants had less hip flexion postfatigue (44.7°±8.4°) than prefatigue (50.4°±10.3°) (F1,14 = 17.026, P=.001). At peak vertical ground reaction force, participants had less knee flexion postfatigue (?35.9°±6.5°) than prefatigue (?38.8°±5.03°) (F1,14 = 11.537, P=.001). Conclusions: Our results demonstrated a more erect landing posture due to a decrease in hip and knee flexion angles in the postfatigue condition. The changes were similar between protocols; however, the FAST-FP was a clinically applicable 5-minute protocol, whereas the SLO-FP lasted approximately 45 minutes.
机译:背景:在疲劳期间改变神经肌肉控制策略可能导致女运动员非接触式前交叉韧带损伤的发生率增加。目的:确定执行跳跳跳跃任务时两种疲劳方案(慢线性氧化疲劳方案[SLO-FP]和功能敏捷性短期疲劳方案[FAST-FP])之间的生物力学差异。设计:对照实验室研究。地点:实验室。患者或其他参与者:方便样本包括15名未受伤的女足球运动员(年龄= 19.2±0.8岁,身高= 1.67±0.05m,质量= 61.7 + 8.1 kg)。干预:在2个方案中,疲劳前和疲劳后成功进行了一次运行-停止-跳跃任务的五次成功试验。对于SLO-FP,在疲劳方案之前进行了峰值耗氧量(V˙o2peak)测试。 V˙o2peak测试结束五分钟后,参与者通过进行30分钟的间隔跑步来开始疲劳方案。 FAST-FP由4组功能电路组成。重复进行2次(疲劳方案)×2次(时间)方差分析,以评估2种方案和时间(疲劳前,疲劳后)之间的差异。主要观察指标:参与者在疲劳前和疲劳后均执行了两种方案,因此在不同时间获得了髋部和膝盖的运动学和动力学学指标。结果:FAST-FP(0.064±0.09 Nm / kgm)时,初次接触(IC)时的内加力矩大于SLO-FP(0.024±0.06 Nm / kgm)(F1,14 = 5.610,P = .03)。在IC,参与者的疲劳后髋屈曲(44.7°±8.1°)小于疲劳前(50.1°±9.5°)(F1,14 = 16.229,P = .001)。在垂直地面反作用力峰值时,参与者的疲劳后髋屈曲(44.7°±8.4°)小于疲劳前(50.4°±10.3°)(F1,14 = 17.026,P = .001)。在垂直地面反作用力达到峰值时,参与者的疲劳后膝关节屈曲(?35.9°±6.5°)小于疲劳前(?38.8°±5.03°)(F1,14 = 11.537,P = .001)。结论:我们的结果表明,由于疲劳后情况下髋部和膝部屈曲角度的减小,使坐姿更加直立。协议之间的变化是相似的。但是,FAST-FP是临床适用的5分钟方案,而SLO-FP则持续了大约45分钟。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号