• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Education and Health Promotion >Promoting evidence-informed policymaking through capacity enhancement in implementation research for health researchers and policymakers in Nigeria: A cross-sectional study
【24h】

Promoting evidence-informed policymaking through capacity enhancement in implementation research for health researchers and policymakers in Nigeria: A cross-sectional study

机译：通过对尼日利亚卫生研究人员和政策制定者的实施研究中的能力增强，促进基于证据的政策制定：一项横断面研究

获取原文
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Background: Capacity constraints on implementation research among policymakers and researchers are a major challenge to the evidence to policy link. This study was designed to bring together senior policymakers and researchers in Nigeria to consider issues around research-to-policy interface and enhance their capacity on implementation research. Methods: The design was a cross-sectional study. A 3-day joint implementation research workshop was held for policymakers and researchers using World Health Organization/TDR Implementation Research Toolkit. Assessment of participants' capacity for evidence-informed policymaking and knowledge on implementation research was done using a 5-point Likert scale questionnaire. A postworkshop key informant interview was also conducted. Results: A total of 20 researchers and 15 policymakers participated in the study. The interaction/partnership between policymakers and researchers was generally rare in terms of priority-setting process, involvement as coinvestigators, and executing strategies to support policymakers' use of research findings. The mean ratings (MNRs) recorded mostly ranged from 1.80 to 1.89 on the 5-point scale. Researchers were rarely involved in the generation of policy-relevant research that satisfies policymakers' needs with MNR very low at 1.74. The MNRs for capacity to acquire, assess, and adapt research were generally considerably higher among researchers (3.16–3.82) than policymakers (2.27–3.20). There was a general consensus that the training tremendously improved participants' understanding and use of implementation research. Conclusion: Policymakers and researchers are increasingly recognizing their need to work with each other in the interest of the health systems. There is a need to create more capacity enhancement platforms that will facilitate the interface between them.
机译：背景：决策者和研究人员对实施研究的能力限制是对政策联系证据的重大挑战。这项研究旨在使尼日利亚的高级决策者和研究人员聚集在一起，以考虑研究与政策之间的互动问题，并增强他们在实施研究方面的能力。方法：该设计为横断面研究。使用世界卫生组织/ TDR实施研究工具包为政策制定者和研究人员举办了为期3天的联合实施研究研讨会。使用5点Likert量表对参与者进行循证决策的能力和实施研究的知识进行评估。还对车间进行了关键线人访谈。结果：共有20位研究人员和15位决策者参加了研究。决策者与研究人员之间的互动/伙伴关系在确定优先次序的过程，作为共同研究人员的参与以及执行策略以支持决策者对研究结果的使用方面通常很少见。在5分制中，记录的平均评级（MNR）大多数在1.80至1.89之间。研究人员很少参与满足政策制定者需求的政策相关研究，其MNR非常低，仅为1.74。研究人员（3.16-3.82）的获得，评估和适应研究能力的MNR通常要比政策制定者（2.27-3.20）高得多。人们普遍认为，培训极大地提高了参与者对实施研究的理解和使用。结论：决策者和研究人员越来越认识到他们需要为卫生系统的利益而相互合作。需要创建更多的容量增强平台，以促进它们之间的接口。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号