首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management >Assessment of academic departments efficiency using data envelopment analysis
【24h】

Assessment of academic departments efficiency using data envelopment analysis

机译:使用数据包络分析评估学术部门的效率

获取原文
           

摘要

Purpose: In this age of knowledge economy, universities play an important role in the development of a country. As government subsidies to universities have been decreasing, more efficient use of resources becomes important for university administrators. This study evaluates the relative technical efficiencies of academic departments at the Islamic University in Gaza (IUG) during the years 2004-2006. Design/methodology/approach: This study applies Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) to assess the relative technical efficiency of the academic departments. The inputs are operating expenses, credit hours and training resources, while the outputs are number of graduates, promotions and public service activities. The potential improvements and super efficiency are computed for inefficient and efficient departments respectively. Further, multiple linear -regression is used to develop a relationship between super efficiency and input and output variables.Findings: Results show that the average efficiency score is 68.5% and that there are 10 efficient departments out of the 30 studied. It is noted that departments in the faculty of science, engineering and information technology have to greatly reduce their laboratory expenses. The department of economics and finance was found to have the highest super efficiency score among the efficient departments. Finally, it was found that promotions have the greatest contribution to the super efficiency scores while public services activities come next.Research limitations/implications: The paper focuses only on academic departments at a single university. Further, DEA is deterministic in nature.Practical implications: The findings offer insights on the inputs and outputs that significantly contribute to efficiencies so that inefficient departments can focus on these factors.Originality/value: Prior studies have used only one type of DEA (BCC) and they did not explicitly answer the question posed by the inefficient departments "Which of the resources should be given priority so that these inefficient DMUs become efficient?". This study uses both (BCC) and (CCR) in addition to relating efficiencies to input and output variables.
机译:目的:在知识经济时代,大学在国家发展中发挥着重要作用。随着政府对大学的补贴不断减少,对大学管理者来说,更有效地利用资源变得很重要。这项研究评估了2004-2006年间加沙伊斯兰大学(IUG)学术部门的相对技术效率。设计/方法/方法:本研究应用数据包络分析(DEA)评估学术部门的相对技术效率。投入是运营费用,学时和培训资源,而产出是毕业生人数,晋升和公共服务活动。分别针对效率低下和效率高的部门计算潜在的改进和超效率。此外,使用多元线性回归建立超效率与输入和输出变量之间的关系。研究结果:结果表明,平均效率得分为68.5%,在研究的30个部门中,有10个效率部门。值得注意的是,科学,工程和信息技术学院的部门必须大大减少他们的实验室费用。在高效部门中,经济和财政部门的最高效率得分最高。最后,发现晋升对超效率得分的贡献最大,而公共服务活动紧随其后。研究的局限/意义:本文仅针对一所大学的学术部门。此外,DEA本质上是确定性的。实践意义:研究结果提供了对显着提高效率的投入和产出的见解,因此效率低下的部门可以专注于这些因素。 ),他们没有明确回答效率低下的部门提出的问题:“应优先分配哪些资源,以使效率低下的DMU变得有效?”。除了将效率与输入和输出变量相关之外,本研究还使用了(BCC)和(CCR)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号