...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Institute of Medicine >Comparison of Axillary Temperature with Oral Temperature and Determination of Optimum Placement Time of Thermometer in Adults of Teaching Hospital, Nepal
【24h】

Comparison of Axillary Temperature with Oral Temperature and Determination of Optimum Placement Time of Thermometer in Adults of Teaching Hospital, Nepal

机译：尼泊尔教学医院成人腋窝温度与口腔温度的比较及温度计最佳放置时间的确定

获取原文
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Introduction: Accurate temperature measurement is important to person, in whom suspicionof infection could result in investigations, administration of antibiotics, and even hospitaladmission. This study was done with the aim to determine the optimal dwell time of thethermometer in oral and axillary sites required to accurately reflect the stabilized core bodytemperature.Method: Cross-sectional survey of 113 adult patients was done who were admitted inManmohan Cardio- Thoracic Vascular and Transplant Center (MCTVC) in the periodbetween 16th July to August 2013. Ethical approval from the Institutional Review Board(IRB) of TUIOM and permission from the respective hospital authority was taken beforedata collection. Conventional glass mercury thermometer were checked and brought to95 degree of Fahrenheit before each measurement of the temperature. Two thermometerswere simultaneously placed in oral cavity and in the axillary skin sites. Reading of the oraltemperature was done in 1 and 3 minutes, similarly, reading of axillary temperature was donein 3 and 5 minutes. Data was analyzed in SPSS 18 by using parametric and nonparametrictests.Results: Findings revealed the mean temperature difference between 1 minute oral to 3minute axilla was 0.92 ± 0.79 SD, and the 3 minute oral to 5 minute axilla was 0.96 ± 0.82SD, the difference was significant (P<0.05). Further, the mean oral temperature in 1 minutewas 97.75 ± 1.27 SD, and in 3 minutes was 98.69 ± 1.37 SD. Similarly, mean temperature ofaxilla in 3 minutes was 97.67± 1.40 SD, whereas mean in 5 minutes was 98.43 ± 1.46 SD.The mean difference was significant.Conclusion: The effective time to measure oral temperature was three minute and it was fiveminutes for axillary measurement.
机译：简介：准确的温度测量对人很重要，怀疑感染可能会导致调查，抗生素使用，甚至入院。这项研究的目的是确定温度计的最佳停留时间，以准确反映稳定的核心体温所需的口腔和腋窝部位。方法：对113名成年患者进行了横断面调查，这些患者入选了曼莫汉心胸血管外科和移植中心（MCTVC）在2013年7月16日至8月之间。在收集数据之前，已获得TUIOM机构审查委员会（IRB）的伦理批准以及相关医院当局的许可。在每次测量温度之前，都要检查传统的玻璃水银温度计并使其达到华氏95度。同时将两个温度计分别置于口腔和腋窝皮肤部位。在1和3分钟内读取口腔温度，类似地，在3和5分钟内读取腋窝温度。结果：研究发现，口服1分钟至3分钟腋窝之间的平均温差为0.92±0.79 SD，口服3分钟至5分钟腋窝之间的平均温差为0.96±0.82SD。显着（P <0.05）。另外，1分钟的平均口腔温度为97.75±1.27SD，3分钟的平均口腔温度为98.69±1.37SD。同样，腋窝3分钟的平均温度为97.67±1.40 SD，而5分钟内的平均温度为98.43±1.46 SD，平均差异显着。结论：测量口腔温度的有效时间为3分钟，腋窝测量为5分钟。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号