• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the Korean Chemical Society >A Survey of the Actual Conditions of Operation and Perceptions of Science Teachers and Students Regarding the 7th Elective-Centered Curriculum of High School Science Subjects
【24h】

A Survey of the Actual Conditions of Operation and Perceptions of Science Teachers and Students Regarding the 7th Elective-Centered Curriculum of High School Science Subjects

机译：关于高中理科第七科选修课的理科师生操作和知觉的实际情况调查

获取原文
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The purpose of this study was to identify the actual conditions of operation in school and investigate the perceptions of science teachers and students regarding the 7th elective-centered curriculum of high school science subjects. For this study, a questionnaire survey was conducted for the selected subjects including 127 high school science teachers and 763 high school students in their third year who had experienced the 7th elective-centered curriculum. As a result of the study, concerning the way to present the elective subjects of science, many cases were the alternative way and the group-elective way in humanity courses while natural science courses had the alternative way and the free-elective way in most cases. In other words, in many cases, the right of elective was given within a limited range. The result of the investigation on science teachers' perceptions on the elective-centered curriculum was that negative views dominated as a whole. Especially, earth science teachers showed the most negative attitudes. The number of biology and chemistry teachers who supported students' right to opt subjects were lower than that of physics teachers and earth science teachers who were against it. To help students make a right choice, many viewed that the system of the college Scholastic Ability Test should be complemented in order to prevent any disadvantage to each elective subject or that it was necessary to have systematic and realistic career education. As the result of investigating the perception of high school students in their third year regarding the elective-centered curriculum, they were usually not very satisfied with it. As the reason for it, many said the selection right was limited. Many others also expressed that there were lack of public relations and education on subjects and careers. Based on these results, limits still exist in accepting all demands although there are a lot of efforts made to smoothly adjust supply and demand of science teachers as well as students' electives in the field of school. It is considered necessary to come up with counterplan and complements to prevent basic science from being neglected or lower academic achievement in the subject of science from happening, and at the same time to harmoniously deal with supply and demand of science teachers as well as the issues of students?ˉ demands given the actual conditions of school.
机译：这项研究的目的是确定学校的实际运行状况，并调查理科教师和学生对以高中科学科目为第七选修课的课程的看法。在本研究中，对选定的科目进行了问卷调查，其中包括127名高中理科老师和763名高中三年级学生，他们经历了第七届选修课。研究结果表明，关于科学选修课程的呈现方式，很多情况下是人文课程的替代方法和群体选修方法，而自然科学课程在大多数情况下具有替代方法和自由选修方法。换句话说，在许多情况下，选举权是在有限的范围内给予的。对理科教师对以选修课为中心的课程的看法进行调查的结果是，负面观点总体上占主导地位。尤其是地球科学老师表现出最消极的态度。支持学生选择学科的生物学和化学老师的数量少于反对该学科的物理老师和地球科学老师的数量。为了帮助学生做出正确的选择，许多人认为，应补充大学学业能力测验的系统，以防止对每个选修科目产生不利影响，或者有必要进行系统且现实的职业教育。由于调查了高三学生对以选修课为中心的课程的看法，因此他们通常对此并不十分满意。作为其原因，许多人说选择权是有限的。许多其他人还表示，缺乏关于主题和职业的公共关系和教育。基于这些结果，尽管为平滑理科老师和学生选修课的供需做出了许多努力，但接受所有要求仍然存在限制。认为有必要提出对策和补充，以防止基础科学被忽视或降低科学学科的学术成就，同时和谐地处理理科教师的供求以及问题。有多少学生？根据学校的实际情况提出要求。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号