...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research >The Views of Medical Students about the Purpose and Objectivity of Assessment in a Medical College in Western Nepal
【24h】

The Views of Medical Students about the Purpose and Objectivity of Assessment in a Medical College in Western Nepal

机译：尼泊尔西部医学院的医学生对评估目的和客观性的看法

获取原文
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

ABSTRACTContext: Previous studies had shown problems with the different methods of assessment in medical schools. However, studies in Nepal are lacking. Objective: The present study was carried out to obtain information on the purpose of assessment in an ideal world and at the Manipal College of Medical Sciences (MCOMS) and the perception of student respondents regarding the objectivity of assessment at MCOMS.Methods: The study was carried out among the second to seventh semester students during February 2006, using a three part semi-structured questionnaire. The first part collected basic demographic information, the second was related to the purpose of assessment in an ideal world and at MCOMS, and the third dealt with the perceived objectivity of assessment at MCOMS. Percentage agreement scores were compared among the basic science (semesters II, III and IV) and clinical science students (semesters V, VI and VII) using the ?2 test (p<0.05). The median total scores were compared among different subgroups using appropriate non-parametric tests (p<0.05).Findings: 340 students participated in the study (overall response rate- 74.1%). 165 respondents (48.5%) were basic science students. 166 students (49.9%) were Indians, 145 (43.5%) were Nepalese and 22 (6.6%) were Sri Lankans and others. Basic science students were significantly more likely to agree that assessment at MCOMS ensured competence, provided feedback and guided student learning. The median total score was 22 (maximum score -32). The score was higher among basic science and Sri Lankan students. Conclusions: The overall perceived objectivity of assessment at MCOMS was not high. Modifications in the assessment system may be considered. Further studies are required.
机译：摘要背景：以前的研究表明医学院校不同的评估方法存在问题。但是，尼泊尔缺乏研究。目的：本研究旨在获得有关理想世界和Manipal医学学院（MCOMS）评估目的以及学生对MCOMS评估客观性的看法的信息。在2006年2月的第二至第七学期学生中，使用了三部分的半结构问卷。第一部分收集了基本的人口统计信息，第二部分与理想世界和MCOMS中评估的目的有关，第三部分涉及MCOMS评估的客观性。使用？2检验比较基础科学（第二，第三和第四学期）和临床科学学生（第五，第六和第七学期）的百分比一致性得分（p <0.05）。使用适当的非参数检验比较了不同亚组之间的中位数总得分（p <0.05）。结果：340名学生参加了研究（总应答率为74.1％）。 165位受访者（48.5％）是基础科学专业的学生。 166名学生（49.9％）是印度人，145名（43.5％）是尼泊尔人，22名（6.6％）是斯里兰卡人等。基础科学专业的学生更有可能同意在MCOMS进行评估可确保其能力，提供反馈并指导学生学习。中位数总分为22（最高得分为-32）。基础科学和斯里兰卡学生的分数较高。结论：MCOMS评估的总体感觉客观性不高。可以考虑评估系统中的修改。需要进一步研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号