...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Revista Brasileira de Ciência Avícola >Effect of Synthetic Emulsifier and Natural Biosurfactant on Feed Process and Quality of Pelletized Feed in Broiler Diet
【24h】

Effect of Synthetic Emulsifier and Natural Biosurfactant on Feed Process and Quality of Pelletized Feed in Broiler Diet

机译：合成乳化剂和天然生物活性剂对肉鸡饮食饲料过程的饲料过程和质量

获取原文
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

A feed production trial was conducted to study the effect of synthetic emulsifier and natural biosurfactant the process and quality of pelletized broiler feed. A corn-soy based broiler diet was formulated with fixed ratio 2:1 of oil-to-water with two types of emulsifiers, namely glyceryl polyethylene glycol ricinoleate synthetic emulsifier and lysophosphatidylcholine natural biosurfactant. T1: Basal diet with no water and no emulsifier; T2: Basal diet with water and no emulsifier; T3: Basal diet with water and synthetic emulsifier glyceryl polyethylene glycol ricinoleate; T4: Basal diet with water and a natural biosurfactant lysophosphatidylcholine as comparative treatment. The treatment diets were manufactured by a commercial feed mill. The electricity cost and meal temperature were measured during the process of milling. Composite samples were collected from different processed points, tested for physical properties, chemical stability and biostability of pelletized feed. Pellet quality of emulsifier supplemented diets was significantly (p<0.05) improved in crumble and pellet intact form. Correlation between emulsifier and pelletize processed cost was not observed in this present study. No deteriorate effect was observed in hydrolytic rancidity (AV), oxidation rancidity (PV), mold count, moisture content and water activity. However, percentage of starch gelatinization on pelletized feed was significantly (p< 0.0001) improved in both types of emulsifier treated diets. These results demonstrated that the addition of emulsifier to broiler diet improved pellet quality to some extent although significant difference between synthetic emulsifier and natural biosurfactant was not observed.
机译：进行了一种饲料生产试验，研究了合成乳化剂和天然生物表面活性剂的效果和质量粒化肉鸡进料的方法和质量。基于玉米大豆的肉鸡饮食用固定比例2：1用两种类型的乳化剂，即甘油聚乙二醇蓖麻油合成乳化剂和溶血磷脂酰胆碱天然生物活性剂。 T1：基础饮食没有水，没有乳化剂; T2：基础饮食与水，没有乳化剂; T3：基础饮食水和合成乳化剂甘油糖聚乙二醇蓖麻原酸; T4：基础饮食与水和天然的生物活体剂溶血磷磷酰氨基作为对比处理。治疗饮食由商用饲料厂制造。在研磨过程中测量了电力成本和膳食温度。从不同的加工点收集复合样品，用于物理性质，化学稳定性和粒料饲料的生物稳定性。乳化剂颗粒质量补充饮食显着（p <0.05）改善碎屑和颗粒完整形式。本研究未观察到乳化剂与造粒加工成本之间的相关性。在水解裂变（AV），氧化酸累积（PV），模核，水分含量和水活动中没有观察到劣化效果。然而，在颗粒化饲料上的淀粉凝胶化百分比显着（P <0.0001）改善了两种类型的乳化剂处理的饮食。这些结果表明，在一定程度上，添加乳化剂以改善颗粒质量，但不观察到合成乳化剂和天然活性剂之间的显着差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号