...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of medical Internet research >The Korean Version of the Academic Cyberincivility Assessment Questionnaire for Nursing Students in South Korea: Validity and Reliability Study
【24h】

The Korean Version of the Academic Cyberincivility Assessment Questionnaire for Nursing Students in South Korea: Validity and Reliability Study

机译：韩国版学术网络动力学评估问卷调查韩国护理学生：有效性和可靠性研究

获取原文
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Background Cybercivility, the practice of what to say and how to say it in online environments, encourages individuals to treat each other with respect. However, the anonymity of online communities may lead some individuals to behave in ways that violate social and cultural norms. These individuals treat others with a lack of regard and even bully others in faceless online confrontations. This practice of cyberincivility can be found across the internet, on commercial sites, and in schools offering online courses. Research on cybercivility and cyberincivility has increased in the United States, where instruments have been developed to measure the impact of cyberincivility in health profession education. However, there is no available instrument that measures nursing students’ online behaviors in South Korea. Objective The aim of this study was to develop and evaluate a Korean version of the Academic Cyberincivility Assessment Questionnaire developed in the United States. Methods Data were collected from 213 nursing students in three South Korean colleges. The Academic Cyberincivility Assessment Questionnaire developed by De Gagne and colleagues was adapted to measure students’ knowledge of cybercivility, and their experiences with and acceptability of cyberincivility. Content validity was tested using the content validity index (CVI). Criterion validity was tested using the digital citizenship scale. Reliability was evaluated using Cronbach alpha. The goodness-of-fit of construct validity was determined through exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses. Results The CVI was 0.8 or higher for all items. Kuder–Richardson Formula 20, measuring reliability of the knowledge scale, was 0.22 and Cronbach alpha, measuring reliability of the experience scale, was .96. The goodness-of-fit of the model was Chi square=5568.63 ( P &.001), the comparative fit index (CFI) was 0.92, and the root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) was 0.08, which satisfied the criteria. The reliability of the acceptability scale was .96, and the goodness-of-fit indices satisfied the criteria (minimum Chi square/df=2.34, Tucker-Lewis Index =0.92, incremental fit index=0.93, root mean square residual=0.05, CFI=0.93, and RMSEA=0.08). Conclusions This study extended and reevaluated the US version of cybercivility scales in a culturally distinct context. The three dimensions of cybercivility include knowledge, experience, and acceptability. Acceptability is well-validated as a dimension, whereas the knowledge dimension requires reexamination for application to Koreans. A revision of the instrument is needed that considers the cultural differences between South Korea and the United States. This paper calls for more attention to be paid to contextualized cybercivility scales among health professions in countries outside the United States.
机译：背景网络加动力，在线环境中可以说和如何说明的操作，鼓励个人尊重彼此。然而，在线社区的匿名性可能导致一些人以违反社会和文化规范的方式行事。这些人在不露面的在线对抗中缺乏甚至欺负他人，甚至欺负他人。这种手机动力活动的做法可以在互联网上，商业地点和提供在线课程的学校找到。在美国的网络动力学和网络动力学的研究有所增加，已经制定了仪器以衡量控制卫生专业教育的网络动力学的影响。但是，没有可用的仪器，可在韩国进行护理学生的在线行为。客观本研究的目的是开发和评估韩国文字的学术网络动力学评估问卷调查问卷。方法从三所韩国三所高校的213名护理学生收集数据。 De Gagne及其同事开发的学术网络动力学评估问卷调整，旨在衡量学生对网络性病的了解，以及他们的经验和网络动力学的可接受性。使用内容有效性索引（CVI）测试内容有效性。使用数字公民身份规模测试了标准有效性。使用Cronbach Alpha评估可靠性。通过探索性和验证性因子分析确定构建有效性的健康。结果所有物品的CVI为0.8或更高。 Kuder-Richardson公式20，测量知识规模的可靠性，为0.22和Cronbach alpha，测量体验规模的可靠性，是.96。模型的拟合良好是Chi Square = 5568.63（P＆ .001），比较拟合指数（CFI）为0.92，近似的根均方误差（RMSEA）为0.08，这使得标准满足标准。可接受性规模的可靠性是.96，拟合良好指数满足标准（最小CHI方/ DF = 2.34，Tucker-Lewis指数= 0.92，增量配合指数= 0.93，均方根剩余= 0.05， CFI = 0.93和RMSEA = 0.08）。结论这项研究在文化截然不同的背景下延伸和重新评估美国版本的网络加动度鳞片。网络加动力的三个维度包括知识，经验和可接受性。可接受性被良好验证为维度，而知识维度需要重新审查以申请韩国人。需要修订仪器，以考虑韩国与美国之间的文化差异。本文要求更多地关注在美国以外国家的健康专业之间支付给上下文的网络加动度尺度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号