...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research >An In-Vitro Evaluation of Microbial Adhesion on Different Types of Orthodontic Brackets
【24h】

An In-Vitro Evaluation of Microbial Adhesion on Different Types of Orthodontic Brackets

机译：不同类型正畸支架微生物粘附的体外评价

获取原文
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Information regarding the adhesion of bacterial species and plaque accumulation to bracket material is limited.Adequate information is needed in order to offer patients orthodontic treatment without significantly increasing their risk of developing white spots, caries, or gingival inflammation.Aim: To determine the levels of the caries-inducing S.mutans species on metallic, self-ligating and ceramic brackets and to compare the total bacterial counts and counts of species present on these bracket materials.Materials and Methods: By means of an in-vitro study, six commercially available bracket systems {3M Gemini (A), American Ortho (B), Ormco (C), Begg (D), Ceramic (E) and Self-ligating (F)} were compared.The brackets were bonded in the cell well culture plate and the agar plates were prepared.Brain heart infusion medium including bacteria and artificial saliva was introduced to each bracket system containing 10 premolar brackets and were incubated.After 72 hours, the adherent bacteria were then detached by sonication and the Colony-Forming Units (CFU) of Streptococcus mutans were calculated on each bracket and were analysed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) software version 17.0 for Windows.Results: Between the different bracket types, significant differences were found in terms of biofilm formation.The Begg brackets showed the least bacterial adhesion and the selfligating brackets showed the highest bacterial adhesion and was statistically significant among all the groups (p 0.05).Conclusion: Different orthodontic brackets serve as different loci for biofilm formation showing that the Begg brackets are the most hygienic among all the brackets taken in this study.
机译：关于细菌种类和菌斑堆积到支架材料的粘附性的信息是需要limited.Adequate信息，以便为患者提供正畸治疗无显著增加他们的发展白斑，龋齿，或齿龈inflammation.Aim风险：要确定的水平龋诱导在金属变形链球菌物种，自锁和陶瓷支架和总细菌计数和存在于这些托架materials.Materials和方法种类的计数比较：通过在体外研究的手段，六市售托架系统{3M双子（A），美国邻（B），Ormco（C），贝格（d），陶瓷（E）和自锁（F）}是compared.The括号中的细胞孔培养板贴合和琼脂平板包括细菌和人工唾液prepared.Brain心脏浸液培养基被引入到含有10个前臼齿括号每个支架系统和分别incubated.After 72小时后，将粘附的细菌然后通过超声处理和菌落形成单位（CFU）的计算上的每个托架变形链球菌和使用统计软件包社会科学（SPSS），用于Windows.Results软件版本17.0分析分离：不同类型的支架之间，显著在生物膜formation.The贝格括号方面发现差异表明至少细菌粘附和selfligating括号显示出最高的细菌粘附和统计学中所有显著组（p 0.05）。结论：不同的正畸托槽作为不同基因座生物膜形成可见的贝格括号都在这项研究中所采取的括号中最卫生。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号