• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine >A Systematic Assessment of YouTube Content on Femoroacetabular Impingement: An Updated Review
【24h】

A Systematic Assessment of YouTube Content on Femoroacetabular Impingement: An Updated Review

机译：对股股票抗静的youtube内容的系统评估：更新的评论

获取原文
       
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Background: Online video-sharing platforms such as YouTube have become popular sources of medical information for patients. However, concern exists regarding the quality of such non–peer reviewed content. In fact, a previous investigation found the majority of YouTube information related to femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) to be of poor quality. Purpose: To provide an updated assessment of the quality of FAI-related videos available on YouTube. Study Design: Cross-sectional study. Methods: The terms FAI , femoroacetabular impingement , and hip impingement were searched on YouTube, and exclusion criteria were applied to the first 100 results for each term. The diagnostic and treatment content of each video was graded and assigned a quality assessment rating based on a previously used rubric. Video characteristics (e.g. duration, views, “likes”) were compared using both quality assessment rating and video source. Results: A total of 142 videos were included in the final analysis. The most common video source was educational (48.6%), followed by physician-sponsored (30.3%). The majority of videos were graded as “somewhat useful” for both diagnostic and treatment content (59.4% and 61.6%, respectively); however, treatment content was rated “not useful” more often than diagnostic information (20.3% vs. 8.7%, respectively). Videos rated as “somewhat useful” received the most views per day on average, while educational videos were the most viewed by source (views and views per day). Educational videos had more views and likes on average than physician-sponsored videos ( P & .05), but all other comparisons of video characteristics by source were not significant. Video duration was the only characteristic found to vary significantly by quality assessment rating ( P & .001 for both diagnostic and treatment analyses), with higher-quality videos tending to be longer. Videos rated as “excellent” and “very useful” had mean durations &30 minutes but were viewed the least. Conclusion: The overall quality of FAI-related content on YouTube remains low. Clinicians should be familiar with medical information available to patients on the internet, as it can influence patients’ perspectives and shared decision-making processes. This review substantiates the need for more publicly available, high-quality video content regarding the diagnosis and treatment of FAI.
机译：背景：YouTube等在线视频共享平台已成为患者的流行的医疗信息来源。然而，关于这种非同行评审内容的质量存在的关注。事实上，先前的调查发现了与股股突表（FAI）相关的大多数YouTube信息，质量差。目的：为YouTube上提供的FAI相关视频的质量提供更新的评估。研究设计：横截面研究。方法：在YouTube上搜索FAI，股骨旁的冲击和髋关节冲击的术语，并将排除标准应用于每个术语的前100个结果。每个视频的诊断和治疗内容被评分并基于先前使用的标题分配了质量评估等级。使用质量评估等级和视频源进行比较视频特征（例如，持续时间，观点，“喜欢”）。结果：最终分析中共有142个视频。最常见的视频来源是教育（48.6％），其次是医生 - 赞助（30.3％）。大多数视频对于诊断和治疗含量（分别为59.4％和61.6％）渐变为“有点有用”;然而，治疗含量比诊断信息更常为“没有用”（分别为20.3％，分别为8.7％）。视频被评为“有点有用”平均每天获得最多的观点，而教育视频是由来源（每天视图和观点）的最佳次数。教育视频的观点更好，平均比医师 - 赞助的视频（P＆amp; .05），但通过源的视频特征的所有其他比较并不重要。视频持续时间是质量评估评级（P＆amp;诊断和治疗分析的P＆amp; .001;诊断和治疗分析）唯一发现的唯一特征，具有更高的视频趋势。视频被评为“优秀”和“非常有用”的平均持续时间＆amp; 30分钟，但被认为是最少的。结论：YouTube上的FAI相关内容的整体质量仍然低。临床医生应熟悉互联网上患者可用的医疗信息，因为它可以影响患者的观点和共享决策过程。本综述证实需要对FAI诊断和治疗的更加公开，高质量的视频内容。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号