...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine >Continuous Family Access to the Intensive Care Unit: A Mixed Method Exploratory Study
【24h】

Continuous Family Access to the Intensive Care Unit: A Mixed Method Exploratory Study

机译：连续家庭进入重症监护病房：混合方法探索性研究

获取原文
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Introduction:Intensive care unit (ICU) visitation has traditionally been restrictive, primarily due to septic considerations and staff apprehension towards unrestricted visitation policy. However, ICU admission is stressful for patients and their families and the presence of family relatives at ICU patients' bedside may help alleviate the same. The present study compares the viewpoints of healthcare workers (HCW) and patients' family members regarding these two types of visitation policies.Materials and methods:The initial assessment involved a qualitative investigation, based on an inductive grounded theory approach. Participant interviews were audiotaped, transcribed, manually coded, themes analyzed, and aggregate dimensions unfolded. Subsequently, a structured proforma filled by stakeholders and responses were coded as categorical variables (quantitative investigation). Their association with a continuous presence of family members was seen using univariate analysis (Chi-square test) and p 0.05 was considered significant. Satisfaction levels were rated on a Likert scale.Results:Eighty-six stakeholders [group A: HCWs (15 doctors, 29 nurses), group B: patients (n = 18), and their relatives (n = 24)] were interviewed. While group A preferred restricted visitation policy (RVP), group B preferred unrestricted visitation policy (UVP). Quantitative data confirmed that HCWs (92.8% nurses and 85.7% doctors) were more satisfied with RVP and group B (92.3% relatives and 87.5% patients) with UVP. Group A (75.9% nurses and 93.3% doctors) therefore preferred RVP and group B (75% families and 66.6% patients) preferred UVP.Conclusion:The patients and their families were more satisfied with UVP contrary to HCWs who were skeptical towards UVP and preferred RVP.How to cite this article:Mahajan RK, Gupta S, Singh G, Mahajan R, Gautam PL. Continuous Family Access to the Intensive Care Unit: A Mixed Method Exploratory Study. Indian J Crit Care Med 2021;25(5):540-550.Copyright ? 2021; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.
机译：简介：重症监护单位（ICU）探视传统上是限制性的，主要是由于脓毒症的考虑因素和员工对不受限制的探访政策的忧虑。然而，ICU入院对患者及其家人来说压力很大，并且在ICU患者床边的家庭亲属的存在可能有助于缓解相同的。本研究比较了医疗保健工人（HCW）和患者家庭成员关于这两种类型的探访政策的观点。关于基于归纳接地理论方法的初步评估涉及定性调查。参与者采访是录音，转录，手动编码，分析的主题，展开的总尺寸。随后，被利益相关者和反应填充的结构化形式被编码为分类变量（定量调查）。使用单变量分析（Chi-Square测试）和P <0.05被认为是显着的，他们与家庭成员连续存在的关联。满意度水平被评为李克特量表。结果：八十六个利益攸关方[组：HCW（15名医生，29名护士），B组：患者（n = 18），他们的亲戚（n = 24）]接受了采访。虽然小组首选受限制的探亲政策（RVP），B组首选无限制的探索政策（UVP）。定量数据证实，HCWS（92.8％的护士和85.7％的医生）对RVP和B组（92.3％的亲属和87.5％的患者）更满意UVP。 A组（75.9％的护士和93.3％的医生）优选的RVP和B组（75％的家庭和66.6％的患者）优选的UVP.Conclusion：患者及其家庭对UVP违背HCW对UVP持怀疑态度的影响首选rvp.how引用本文：Mahajan Rk，Gupta S，Singh G，Mahajan R，Gautam PL。连续家庭进入重症监护病房：混合方法探索性研究。印度j crit care med 2021; 25（5）：540-550.copyright？ 2021; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers（P）有限公司

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号