首页> 外文期刊>Disasters >States of fragility: stabilisation and its implications for humanitarian action
【24h】

States of fragility: stabilisation and its implications for humanitarian action

机译:脆弱国家:稳定及其对人道主义行动的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper explores the evolution of international stabilisation agendas and their significance for humanitarian action. Stabilisation includes a combination of military, humanitarian, political and economic activities to control, contain and manage areas affected by armed conflict and complex emergencies. Encompassing narrow security objectives and broader peace-building efforts, stabilisation is both a conservative and potentially transformative, comprehensive and long-term agenda. The open-ended approach allows for widely varying interpretations and applications in different circumstances and by different actors with an assortment of implications for humanitarian action. The relationship between the two is highly uncertain and contentious, due not only to the controversies surrounding stabilisation policies, but also to deep-seated ambiguities at the heart of humanitarianism. While humanitarian actors are preoccupied with the growing involvement of the military in the humanitarian sphere, the paper argues that it is trends in the humanitarian–political interface that represent the more fundamental dilemma.
机译:本文探讨了国际稳定议程的演变及其对人道主义行动的意义。稳定包括军事,人道主义,政治和经济活动的结合,以控制,控制和管理受武装冲突和复杂紧急情况影响的地区。涵盖狭窄的安全目标和更广泛的建设和平努力,稳定既是保守的,又可能是变革性的,全面的长期议程。不限成员名额的做法允许在不同情况下,由不同行为者对人道主义行动采取各种不同的解释和适用方式。两者之间的关系是高度不确定和有争议的,这不仅是由于围绕稳定政策的争议,而且是由于人道主义核心的深层次模棱两可。尽管人道主义行为者全神贯注于军队在人道主义领域的日益介入,但本文认为,人道主义与政治互动的趋势是更根本的困境。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号