...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education >Whose quality? Social actors in the interface of transnational and national higher education policy
【24h】

Whose quality? Social actors in the interface of transnational and national higher education policy

机译：谁的素质？跨国和国家高等教育政策交往中的社会参与者

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The article analyzes the construction of national reactions to a transnational higher education policy from the point of view of the representation of social actors in policy documents. The data are provided by the so-called Bologna Process, particularly the development of comparable quality assurance systems, and Finnish responses to those demands. Who is represented as active and who as passive, as European policies are discursively translated into national policies? How are those 'quality actors' represented in the policy documents directed at a transnational audience (i.e. the Bologna Process communiqus, as well as national reports on its advancement) as opposed to documents directed at a national, in this case Finnish, audience (i.e. national policy formation documents)? What kinds of policy fields emerge as a result of different representations of actors? This article takes the Bologna Process as an example of the 'glocalisation' of higher education policy.
机译：本文从政策文件中社会参与者的代表角度分析了国家对跨国高等教育政策反应的建构。数据由所谓的博洛尼亚流程提供，尤其是可比质量保证体系的发展以及芬兰对这些需求的响应。正如欧洲政策被话语权转化为国家政策一样，谁代表主动，谁代表被动？在针对跨国受众的政策文件（即博洛尼亚进程公报，以及有关其进展的国家报告）中，那些“质量行为者”如何代表，而不是针对本国受众（即芬兰）的文件（即博洛尼亚进程公报）？国家政策形成文件）？行为者代表的不同会导致哪些政策领域出现？本文以博洛尼亚进程为例，对高等教育政策进行了“全球定位”。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号