首页> 外文期刊>Ecological indicators >Quantifying urban ecological governance: A suite of indices characterizes the ecological planning implications of rapid coastal urbanization
【24h】

Quantifying urban ecological governance: A suite of indices characterizes the ecological planning implications of rapid coastal urbanization

机译:量化城市生态治理:一套指标描述了快速沿海城市化对生态规划的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Urban ecosystems in China have undergone a surge of rapid urbanization leading to phenomenal socioecological transformation. To mitigate the regional ecological and environmental impacts, cross-scale ecological governance has not been well established. This paper aims to propose an assessment framework to examine and understand urban ecological governance (UEG), a concept that intertwines multiple aspects such as governance, planning, and urban ecology into an integrated procedure for policy formulation and implementation. To test the assessment framework and thereby derive a quantitative approach to studying socio-ecological couplings within the urban systems, we choose Lianyungang, a rapid urbanizing coastal city in China for an empirical study. We ascertain each subsystem (e.g., urbanization, ecological, governance) presents a fluctuating trend particularly after 2005. Also, the overall trends of UEG increased slightly during the two study periods (1997-2012 and 2005-2012), mainly due to the influences of the Urban Master Plan and Eastern Coastal Regional Development Strategic Planning of Lianyungang. These results imply that the UEG in China's local governments is unique, and the planning system especially acts a core player to cope with increasing regional ecological risks and uncertainties. It is suggested that China's UEG needs to enhance experimental governance, ecological redline policy (ERP) and multi-plan integration and combine its current government-dominant top-down system with Western bottom-up decision-making mechanisms. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:中国的城市生态系统经历了快速的城市化进程,导致了巨大的社会生态转型。为了减轻区域生态和环境影响,尚未建立跨尺度的生态治理。本文旨在提出一个评估框架,以检查和理解城市生态治理(UEG),该概念将治理,规划和城市生态等多个方面交织在一起,成为政策制定和实施的综合程序。为了测试评估框架并由此得出定量的方法来研究城市系统内的社会生态耦合,我们选择了连云港市(中国快速城市化的沿海城市)进行了实证研究。我们确定每个子系统(例如,城市化,生态,治理)呈现出波动的趋势,尤其是在2005年之后。此外,UEG的总体趋势在两个研究时期(1997-2012年和2005-2012年)略有增加。连云港市城市总体规划和东部沿海区域发展战略规划这些结果表明,中国地方政府的UEG是独一无二的,而规划体系尤其扮演着核心角色,以应对日益增加的区域生态风险和不确定性。建议中国的UEG需要加强实验性治理,生态红线政策(ERP)和多计划整合,并将其当前以政府为主导的自上而下的系统与西方自下而上的决策机制相结合。 (C)2016 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Ecological indicators》 |2017年第1期|225-233|共9页
  • 作者单位

    Xiamen Univ, Coll Environm & Ecol, Minist Educ, Key Lab Coastal & Wetland Ecosyst, South Xiangan Rd, Xiamen 361102, Peoples R China;

    Xiamen Univ, Coll Environm & Ecol, Minist Educ, Key Lab Coastal & Wetland Ecosyst, South Xiangan Rd, Xiamen 361102, Peoples R China;

    Harvard Univ, John F Kennedy Sch Govt, 79 JFK St, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA;

    Univ Maryland, Dept Environm Sci & Technol, 1428 Anim Sci Agr Eng Bldg, College Pk, MD 20742 USA|Univ Maryland, Cluster Sustainabil Built Environm, Suite 1200,5000 Coll Ave, College Pk, MD 20740 USA;

    Univ Trier, Governance & Sustainabil Lab, Behringstr 21, D-54286 Trier, Germany;

    Humboldt Univ, Dept Geog, Rudower Chaussee 16, D-12489 Berlin, Germany;

    Nanjing Univ, Sch Environm, State Key Lab Pollut Control & Resources Reuse, 163 Xianlin Ave, Nanjing 210046, Jiangsu, Peoples R China;

    Xiamen Univ, Coll Environm & Ecol, Minist Educ, Key Lab Coastal & Wetland Ecosyst, South Xiangan Rd, Xiamen 361102, Peoples R China|Georg August Univ Goettingen, Inst Geog, Dept Cartog GIS & Remote Sensing, D-37077 Gottingen, Germany;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Governance; Urban ecosystems; Indicator-driven assessment; Planning; Socio-ecological system; Urbanization;

    机译:治理;城市生态系统;指标驱动的评估;规划;社会生态系统;城市化;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号