• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Emerging Europe Telecommunications Insight >Quick View: UK More European Than American In Dealing With Tech
【24h】

Quick View: UK More European Than American In Dealing With Tech

机译：快速浏览：英国在处理技术方面比欧洲多于美国

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The Latest: The UK Parliament’s Digital, Culture, Media and Sport Committee has published its report on disinformation and fake news. In it, it accuses Facebook of being a 'digital gangster', and of having intentionally and knowingly violated both data privacy and anti-competition laws. Implications: The report calls for the regulation of tech companies, which follows the European rather than the US approach, as the era of self-regulation is over. Coming from Parliament, it carries extra weight even if it is not binding for the government, and we highlight several key issues the report raises: 1. Liability: it calls for the need for a new category beyond platforms or publishers for tech companies, so they can be liable if harmful content is found on their sites. These companies have de facto been given immunity though Section 230 of the 1996 Telecommunications Act in the US, and greater scrutiny would have a major impact on their business models. Similar moves have been made in the US, with regards to deepfakes, but the report goes further; 2. Code of Ethics and an independent regulator: very little details have been given on what would include a new Code of Ethics, and this is something that Parliament is likely to develop in the coming months. The call for a new regulator echoes a recent report on the impact of online media on journalism, and it is clear that, as tech companies impact many different aspects of public life, current sectoral regulators like the ICO (Information Commissioner's Office) or CMA (Competition and Markets Authority) lack the necessary tools to scrutinise these players;
机译：最新消息：英国议会的数字，文化，媒体和体育委员会已经发布了有关虚假信息和虚假新闻的报告。它在其中指控Facebook是“数字黑帮”，并故意和有意违反了数据隐私和反竞争法。启示：随着自我监管时代的结束，该报告呼吁对科技公司进行监管，该监管遵循欧洲而不是美国的方法。来自议会，即使它对政府没有约束力，它也具有额外的分量，我们着重指出报告提出的几个关键问题：1.责任：它要求技术公司的平台或发行商之外的新类别，因此如果在他们的网站上发现有害内容，他们将承担责任。实际上，通过《 1996年美国电信法》第230条，这些公司已获得豁免，而进行更严格的审查将对其业务模式产生重大影响。在美国，针对仿冒产品也采​​取了类似的措施，但该报告更进一步。 2.《道德守则》和一个独立的监管机构：很少提供有关新《道德守则》的内容，这是议会未来几个月可能会制定的。要求设立新监管机构的呼声呼应了最近有关在线媒体对新闻业影响的报告，很明显，随着科技公司影响公共生活的许多不同方面，当前的部门监管机构，如ICO（信息专员办公室）或CMA（竞争和市场管理局）缺乏审查这些参与者的必要工具;

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号