...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Energy Policy >Public views of Scotland's path to decarbonization: Evidence from citizens' juries and focus groups
【24h】

Public views of Scotland's path to decarbonization: Evidence from citizens' juries and focus groups

机译：苏格兰脱碳途径的公众意见：来自公民的陪审团和焦点小组的证据

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Scotland offers a case study of a country with significant fossil energy resources that has seen rapid decarbonization and deployment of renewable energy. We review the key policies that facilitated a 47% reduction in greenhouse gas emissions from 1990 baseline levels and almost 75% of Scottish electricity being produced from renewable sources. Public views on climate policy, renewable energy, and low-carbon technologies are explored using focus groups we conducted in Aberdeen, Peterhead, and Edinburgh and citizens' juries in Aberdeen and Edinburgh. The deliberative processes reveal strong public support for continued diversification of Scotland's energy portfolio to include more renewable energy sources, particularly at the local level. We also found support for increased state involvement in the energy sector. Pro-renewables sentiments and skepticism of industry pervade even in Aberdeen, the main oil and gas hub, alongside support for further exploration of low-carbon emission technologies such as carbon capture and storage (CCS) that retain the ability to continue to use fossil fuels. Although Peterhead stood to benefit from a major CCS project, there was remarkably little awareness of the proposed project among residents. Finally, we argue deliberative processes can help both policy-makers and developers gauge where they can (and cannot) expect support.
机译：苏格兰提供了一个具有重要化石能源的国家的案例研究，这些国家已经迅速脱碳和可再生能源部署。我们审查了1990年基线水平的温室气体排放量减少47％的关键政策，占可再生能源的苏格兰电力的近75％。有关气候政策，可再生能源和低碳技术的公众意见，探讨了我们在阿伯丁和爱丁堡的阿伯丁，Peterhead和爱丁堡和公民陪审团中进行的焦点小组探索。审议流程揭示了苏格兰能源组合的持续多样化，以包括更多可再生能源，特别是在地方一级。我们还发现支持增加能源部门的国家参与。即使在阿伯丁，主要的石油和天然气枢纽中，普遍存在的行业情绪和持怀疑态度，也可以支持进一步探索低碳排放技术，如碳捕获和储存（CCS），以保留继续使用化石燃料的能力。虽然Peterhead站在一个主要的CCS项目中，但居民之间拟议项目的知识了解情况值得注意。最后，我们认为审议流程可以帮助政策制定者和开发人员衡量，他们可以（并且不能）期待支持。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号