• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Environmental Conservation >Meta-analysis of institutional-economic factors explaining the environmental performance of payments for watershed services
【24h】

Meta-analysis of institutional-economic factors explaining the environmental performance of payments for watershed services

机译：对解释集水区服务付款的环境绩效的机构经济因素进行荟萃分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Payments for ecosystem services (PES) are a relatively new economic policy instrument, and the factors that drive and explain their environmental performance are poorly understood. Here a meta-analysis of causal relationships between the institutional design and environmental performance of 47 payments for watershed services (PWS) schemes worldwide showed a significant effect on environmental achievement of the terms and conditions of scheme participation, including the selection of service providers, community participation, the existence and monitoring of quantifiable objectives, and the number of intermediaries between service providers and buyers. Direct payments by downstream hydropower companies to upstream land owners for reduced sediment loads were identified as a successful PWS example. No other significant explanatory factors, such as specific type of watershed service, age or scale of implementation of the PWS scheme were detected. The results are highly dependent on the reliability of the input variables, in particular the measurement of the environmental performance variable. Despite efforts to find quantitative information on the environmental performance of existing PWS schemes, such empirical evidence is lacking in many of the schemes studied. International monitoring guidelines are needed to facilitate comparisons, identify success factors and support the future design of cost-effective PWS schemes.
机译：生态系统服务付款是一种相对较新的经济政策工具，人们对驱动和解释其环境绩效的因素知之甚少。在这里，对全球47个分水岭服务（PWS）计划的制度设计与环境绩效之间因果关系的荟萃分析显示，计划参与条款和条件（包括服务提供商，社区的选择）对环境成就具有重大影响参与，可量化目标的存在和监控，以及服务提供商和购买者之间的中介机构数量。下游水电公司直接向上游土地所有者付款以减少泥沙负荷是成功的PWS实例。没有发现其他重要的解释性因素，例如分水岭服务的特定类型，PWS计划的实施年龄或实施规模。结果高度依赖于输入变量的可靠性，尤其是环境性能变量的测量。尽管努力寻找有关现有PWS计划的环境绩效的定量信息，但是在许多研究的计划中都缺乏这样的经验证据。需要国际监测准则来促进比较，确定成功因素并支持未来设计具有成本效益的PWS计划。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Environmental Conservation》 |2011年第4期|p.380-392|共13页
  • 作者

    ROY BROUWER; ABONESH TESFAYE; PIETER PAUW;

  • 作者单位

    Department of Environmental Economics, Institute for Environmental Studies, VU University Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1087, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, the Netherlands;

    Department of Environmental Economics, Institute for Environmental Studies, VU University Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1087, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, the Netherlands;

    Department of Spatial Analysis and Decision Support, Institute for Environmental Studies, VU University Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1087, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, the Netherlands;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    environmental performance; institutional- economic conditions; meta-analysis; payments for ecosystem services; watershed markets;

    机译：环保性能;制度经济条件;荟萃分析生态系统服务付款;分水岭市场;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号