Abstract Innovative urban forestry governance in Melbourne?: Investigating 'green placemaking' as a nature-based solution
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Environmental research >Innovative urban forestry governance in Melbourne?: Investigating 'green placemaking' as a nature-based solution
【24h】

Innovative urban forestry governance in Melbourne?: Investigating 'green placemaking' as a nature-based solution

机译：墨尔本的创新城市林业治理？：研究“绿色场所营造”作为基于自然的解决方案

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

AbstractA nature-based approach to climate resilience aims to challenge and re-frame conventional environmental management methods by refocusing solutions from technological strategies to socio-ecological principles such as human well-being and community-based governance models, thereby improving and legitimizing the delivery of ecosystem services (ES). There are, however, many challenges to applying a socio-ecological agenda to urban climate resilience and thereby re-framing ES delivery as community and people focused, a knowledge gap extensively outlined in the environmental governance literature. In this paper, we aim to contribute to this re-assesment of urban environmental governance by examining the City of Melbourne's approach to urban re-naturing governance from a place-based perspective. Here we focus on the city's internationally-acclaimed urban forest strategy (UFS), investigating how and to which extent the governance arrangements embedded within the UFS draw strength from diverse perspectives and allow for institutional arrangements that support “situated” reflexive decision making and co-creation. We find that Melbourne's UFS governance process fosters green placemaking by re-focusing climate adaptation solutions from technological strategies to situated socio-ecological principles such as human well-being and community-based decision making. In this sense, this case provides valuable insight for the broader UGI governance field regarding the opportunities and challenges associated with a socio-cultural approach to urban re-naturing and ES delivery.Highlights•Scholars have called for a re-assessment of urban environmental governance.•We examine the City of Melbourne's Urban Forest Strategy (UFS).•Co-governance arrangements in the UFS foster situated decision making pluralism.•Melbourne’s UFS links aims of biodiversity to those of socio-ecological resilience.
机译： 摘要 基于自然的气候适应方法旨在通过将解决方案的重点从技术战略转向社会生态学原理（例如人类健康）来挑战和重构传统的环境管理方法。存在和基于社区的治理模型，从而改善和合法化生态系统服务（ES）的提供。然而，将社会生态学议程应用于城市气候适应力并由此以社区和人民为中心重新定义ES交付存在许多挑战，这是环境治理文献中广泛概述的知识差距。在本文中，我们旨在通过基于场所的角度研究墨尔本市进行城市重新自然化治理的方法，为城市环境治理的重新评估做出贡献。在这里，我们专注于该城市国际认可的城市森林战略（UFS），调查UFS内嵌的治理安排如何以及在多大程度上从多种角度汲取力量，并允许支持“处在”反思性决策和共同决策的制度安排。创建。我们发现，墨尔本的UFS治理流程通过将气候适应解决方案从技术战略重新定位到定位的社会生态原则（如人类福祉和基于社区的决策）来促进绿色场所营造。从这个意义上讲，此案例为UGI治理领域提供了宝贵的见解，涉及与城市文化改造和ES交付的社会文化方法相关的机遇和挑战。 突出显示 • 学者们呼吁对城市环境治理进行重新评估。 • 我们研究了墨尔本市的城市森林战略（ UFS）。 • 合作UFS中的政府管理安排促进了决策的多元化。 • 墨尔本的UFS将生物多样性的目标与社会生态适应力的目标联系起来。 < / ce：simple-para>

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号