...
首页> 外文期刊>Environmental Science & Technology >Fuel and Vehicle Technology Choices for Passenger Vehicles in Achieving Stringent CO_2 Targets: Connections between Transportation and Other Energy Sectors
【24h】

Fuel and Vehicle Technology Choices for Passenger Vehicles in Achieving Stringent CO_2 Targets: Connections between Transportation and Other Energy Sectors

机译:实现严格的CO_2目标的乘用车燃料和车辆技术选择:交通运输与其他能源行业之间的联系

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The regionalized Global Energy Transition (GET-R 6.0) model has been modified to include a detailed description of light-duty vehicle options and used to investigate the potential impact of carbon capture and storage (CCS) and concentrating solar power (CSP) on cost-effective fuel/vehicle technologies in a carbon-constrained world. Total CO_2 emissions were constrained to achieve stabilization at 400-550 ppm, by 2100, at lowesttotal system cost The dominantfuel/vehicle technologies varied significantly depending on CO_2 constraint, future cost of vehicle technologies, and availability of CCS and CSP. For many cases, no one technology dominated on a global scale. CCS provides relatively inexpensive low-CO_2 electricity and heat which prolongs the use of traditional ICEVs. CSP displaces fossil fuel derived electricity, prolongs the use of traditional ICEVs, and promotes electrification of passenger vehicles. In all cases considered, CCS and CSP availability had a major impact on the lowest cost fuel/vehicle technologies, and alternative fuels are needed in response to expected dwindling oil and natural gas supply potential by the end of the century.
机译:已对区域化的全球能源转型(GET-R 6.0)模型进行了修改,以包括对轻型车辆选择的详细描述,并用于研究碳捕获和封存(CCS)和集中太阳能(CSP)对成本的潜在影响碳受限世界中的高效燃料/车辆技术。到2100年,CO_2的总排放量被限制在400-550 ppm的范围内以最低的系统总成本实现稳定。主要的燃料/车辆技术因CO_2限制,车辆技术的未来成本以及CCS和CSP的可用性而有很大差异。在许多情况下,没有一种技术在全球范围内占主导地位。 CCS提供相对廉价的低CO_2电和热量,从而延长了传统ICEV的使用时间。 CSP取代了化石燃料产生的电力,延长了传统ICEV的使用时间,并促进了乘用车的电气化。在所有考虑的情况下,CCS和CSP的可用性对成本最低的燃料/车辆技术都产生了重大影响,并且由于本世纪末石油和天然气供应潜力的预期下降,需要替代燃料。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Environmental Science & Technology》 |2009年第9期|3365-3371|共7页
  • 作者单位

    Department of Energy and Environment, Physical Resource Theory, Chalmers University of Technology, 412 96 Goeteborg, Sweden;

    Department of Energy and Environment, Physical Resource Theory, Chalmers University of Technology, 412 96 Goeteborg, Sweden;

    Product Planning Department, Volvo Car Corporation, Goeteborg, Sweden;

    Systems Analytics and Environmental Sciences Department Ford Motor Company, Mail Drop RIC-2122, Dearborn, Michigan 48121-2053;

    Systems Analytics and Environmental Sciences Department Ford Motor Company, Mail Drop RIC-2122, Dearborn, Michigan 48121-2053;

    Systems Analytics and Environmental Sciences Department Ford Motor Company, Mail Drop RIC-2122, Dearborn, Michigan 48121-2053;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);美国《生物学医学文摘》(MEDLINE);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号