• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Ethics, Place and Environment >Making Theory, Making Sense: Comments on Ronald Moore's Natural Beauty
【24h】

Making Theory, Making Sense: Comments on Ronald Moore's Natural Beauty

机译：做理论，做有意义：评罗纳德·摩尔的自然美

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The broad scope and coherence of Natural Beauty are among its major strengths. Moore's syncretic theory tries to integrate diverse and sometimes conflicting theoretical strands. Of special importance is his recognition that the natural world is a social institution embodying perceptions that are conditioned, experiences communicated through language, and social beliefs and conventions. These lead him to consider the natural world as actually artifactual, and he terms it the 'natureworld'. Among the consequences of this is the reciprocity of natural and artistic beauty, one indication of the inc/usiveness that runs through his theory. My central concern is whether Moore's syncretic theory can successfully combine disparate features of conflicting theories, such as cognitivism and non-cognitivism, and subjectivism and objectivism. Another concern is whether his syncretism can resolve problems such as the apparent inconsistencies raised by his discussion of framing. Here, alternatives that Moore had presumably settled reappear, as when objects, which had presumably been replaced by experiences, re-emerge in his discussion of framing. These comments identify such difficulties and ask whether the way out may be to reframe not natural beauty but the terms of the question.
机译：自然美的广泛范围和连贯性是其主要优势之一。摩尔的合一理论试图整合多样的，有时是相互冲突的理论链。特别重要的是，他认识到自然世界是一个社会制度，体现了有条件的观念，通过语言交流的经验以及社会信仰和惯例。这些使他认为自然世界实际上是人为的，他称其为“自然世界”。其后果之一是自然与艺术之美的互惠，这是贯穿其理论的包容性/暗示性的一种体现。我的中心问题是，摩尔的合一性理论能否成功地将相互矛盾的理论的不同特征结合在一起，例如认知主义和非认知主义以及主观主义和客观主义。另一个问题是他的合体性是否可以解决问题，例如他对取景的讨论引起的明显矛盾。在这里，大概是摩尔定下来的替代物重新出现了，因为大概是被经验代替的物体重新出现在他对框架的讨论中。这些评论指出了这样的困难，并提出了解决的办法是否是重塑自然之美而不是重构问题的术语。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Ethics, Place and Environment》 |2009年第3期|337-341|共5页
  • 作者

    ARNOLD BERLEANT;

  • 作者单位

    Department of Philosophy, Long Island University, Brookville, NY, USA;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号