• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Ethics & the environment >PRESERVATION, PASSIVITY, AND PESSIMISM
【24h】

PRESERVATION, PASSIVITY, AND PESSIMISM

机译：保存，被动性和悲观主义

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Many committed and passionate environmental thinkers currently champion restoration as an appropriate and positive model for human-nature interaction and interdependence. Recent philosophical defenses of restoration sidestep the issues that have been raised about the possibility of restoring degraded nature to a state that is identical, ontologically or evaluatively, to some pre-degraded state. Informed by feminist theory, I expose and explore some problematic assumptions and associations found in common defenses of restoration and defend the thesis that preservation is the more promising avenue to character remediation and the forging of a harmonious human-nature culture. I allow that many restoration projects will be appropriate under a preservationist program; but insist that preservation should be the main approach endorsed.
机译：当前，许多有献身精神和热情的环境思想家主张将恢复作为人与自然互动和相互依存的适当而积极的模式。最近的恢复哲学辩护回避了已经提出的关于将退化的自然恢复到在本体上或评估上都与某个预先退化的状态相同的状态的可能性的问题。在女权主义理论的指导下，我揭露并探索了在修复的共同辩护中发现的一些有问题的假设和联系，并捍卫了以下论点：保存是性格修复和人类与自然和谐文化的更有希望的途径。我允许在保护主义计划下许多恢复项目是适当的；但坚持认为保存应该成为主要方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号