• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>European journal of international management >An exploration of two perspectives on leadership in globalised contexts
【24h】

An exploration of two perspectives on leadership in globalised contexts

机译：探索全球化背景下的领导力的两种观点

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This paper explores two models of leadership in the globalised context, one rooted in instrumentality and the other in appropriateness. While the logic of instrumentality assumes that leadership practices are universal across national and institutional borders, the logic of appropriateness is sensitive to cross-national cultural and institutional differences. These two standpoints and their relation to multinational enterprises (MNEs) are traced in organisational global leadership theory. Ultimately, the consequences of implementing either of these two thought processes while designing leadership development programs are identified. We argue that applying the logic of instrumentality uncritically to leadership in the globalised context of multinational enterprises is fraught with great risk because this logic tends to ignore the diversity and complexity of MNEs and their environments. It is suggested that the logic of appropriateness in leadership constitutes a viable, suitable and complementary alternative.
机译：本文探讨了全球化背景下的两种领导模式，一种基于工具性，另一种基于适当性。虽然工具性的逻辑假设领导实践在国家和机构的边界上是普遍的，但是适当性的逻辑对跨国文化和机构差异很敏感。这两个观点及其与跨国企业（MNEs）的关系可追溯至组织全球领导力理论。最终，确定了在设计领导力发展计划时实施这两种思维过程中的任何一种的后果。我们认为，在跨国企业全球化的背景下将工具性逻辑非批判地应用于领导力方面充满了巨大的风险，因为这种逻辑倾向于忽视跨国公司及其环境的多样性和复杂性。建议在领导中适当的逻辑是可行，适当和互补的选择。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号