首页> 外文期刊>European review >Creativity and the Governance of Universities: Encounters of the Third Kind
【24h】

Creativity and the Governance of Universities: Encounters of the Third Kind

机译:创造力与大学治理:第三种遭遇

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Discussions of creativity and university governance often conflate multiple kinds of creativity-governance relations. Focusing on the third kind' of creativity-governance relations in universities, I discuss the role of creativity in prospecting governance models. In other words, this paper focuses on the methods for creatively seeking (third kind) creative governance models (second kind) that foster academic creativity (first kind). I argue that the methods of prospecting governance models are subject to institutional dynamics that steer such search off the path of creativity. I note in particular two such institutional dynamics that track the prospecting process - namely, professional expertise and referentiality - and I argue that these institutional dynamics generate inherent tension in the governance of creativity in universities. I illustrate these claims with findings from a large-scope research project on the branding of universities.
机译:关于创造力和大学治理的讨论通常将多种类型的创造力与治理关系混为一谈。重点讨论大学中的第三种“创造力—治理”关系,我讨论了创造力在探究治理模型中的作用。换句话说,本文关注于创造性地寻求(第三种)创造性治理模型(第二种)以促进学术创造力(第一类)的方法。我认为,探寻治理模型的方法受制于制度动力,从而引导这种探索脱离了创造力的道路。我特别注意到两个这样的机构动态,它们追踪着探矿过程,即专业知识和参考性,并且我认为这些机构动态在大学创造力的治理中产生了内在的张力。我通过有关大学品牌的大型研究项目的发现来说明这些主张。

著录项

  • 来源
    《European review》 |2018年第1期|S100-S113|共14页
  • 作者

    Drori Gili S.;

  • 作者单位

    Hebrew Univ Jerusalem, Dept Sociol & Anthropol, IL-91905 Jerusalem, Israel;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号