...
首页> 外文期刊>Foresight >Comparing foresight 'style' in six world regions
【24h】

Comparing foresight 'style' in six world regions

机译:比较世界六个地区的远见“风格”

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose - The paper sets out to explore the nature and degree of variation in foresight "style" across six world regions. The underlying hypothesis is that differences in regional context - in terms of political, socio-economic, and cultural conditions - will affect foresight "style". At the same time, a secondary hypothesis acknowledges that policy tool transfer and international learning might soften the influence of contextual conditions. Design/methodology/approach - Using the data collected for more than 800 foresight exercises in six world regions, the paper considers eight different dimensions of foresight "style", including domain coverage, time horizon, target groups, and methods used. It interprets regional differences (and similarities) with reference to dominant political and economic traditions in each region. In so doing, it tests the hypothesis that foresight "style" is influenced by regional context. Findings - The analysis suggests that some foresight "style" dimensions vary between regions more than others. For example, there is marked variation in the domain areas covered by foresight across the world, while some regions appear to prefer particular methods over others. Time horizons also vary. For other dimensions, such as participation levels and the identity of target groups, there is a good deal of similarity. Thus, some dimensions of "style", at least at the aggregate level, seem to be more influenced by regional context than others. Originality/value - The paper is unique in being the first publication to survey such a large sample of foresight activity across a wide part of the globe.
机译:目的-本文着手探讨全球六个地区的远见“风格”变化的性质和程度。基本假设是,区域背景的差异(从政治,社会经济和文化条件而言)将影响预见的“风格”。同时,一个次要假设承认政策工具的转移和国际学习可能会软弱环境条件的影响。设计/方法/方法-使用在六个世界区域中进行的800多个预见性练习收集的数据,本文考虑了预见性“样式”的八个不同维度,包括领域覆盖范围,时间范围,目标群体和使用的方法。它根据每个地区的主要政治和经济传统来解释地区差异(和相似性)。在这种情况下,它检验了前瞻性“风格”受区域背景影响的假设。调查结果-分析表明,某些地区的前瞻性“风格”差异更大。例如,在世界范围内,远见卓识覆盖的领域存在明显差异,而某些地区似乎更喜欢某些特定方法。时间范围也有所不同。对于其他方面,例如参与程度和目标群体的身份,有很多相似之处。因此,“风格”的某些维度,至少在总体上,似乎比其他维度更受区域背景的影响。原创性/价值-该论文是独一无二的,它是第一份对全球范围内如此大的远见活动样本进行调查的出版物。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号