• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>German economic review >Continuing Vocational Training Forms and Establishment Productivity in Germany
【24h】

Continuing Vocational Training Forms and Establishment Productivity in Germany

机译：在德国继续职业培训形式并提高生产力

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This paper provides evidence of the productivity effects of different continuing vocational training forms in Germany. Using the waves 1997-2001 of the IAB establishment panel, it is found that formal external courses have the largest positive impact on productivity. Formal internal courses and quality circles have a smaller positive impact. Self-induced learning, participation at seminars and talks and job rotation do not enhance productivity while training on the job has a negative productivity impact. Establishments with an inefficient production structure decide to offer training in order to boost productivity. This paper also shows that taking into account selectivity of the training decision, unobserved time-invariant heterogeneity, human resource practices, as well as establishment and employee characteristics has an important impact on the measurement results.
机译：本文提供了证据，证明了德国不同的继续职业培训形式对生产率的影响。利用IAB成立小组的1997-2001年浪潮，发现正规的外部课程对生产力产生最大的积极影响。正式的内部课程和质量圈子的积极影响较小。自我诱导的学习，参加研讨会和讲座以及轮岗不会提高生产力，而在职培训会对生产力产生负面影响。生产结构效率低下的企业决定提供培训以提高生产率。本文还表明，考虑到培训决策的选择性，未观察到的时不变异质性，人力资源实践以及机构和员工特征对度量结果有重要影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号