...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Higher Education Research & Development >Informality, power and relationships in postgraduate supervision: supervising PhD candidates over coffee
【24h】

Informality, power and relationships in postgraduate supervision: supervising PhD candidates over coffee

机译：研究生监督中的非正式性，权力和关系：通过咖啡监督博士候选人

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

A great deal of literature in recent years has focused on the supervisory relationship, yet very little has been written about the nature or content of supervisory meetings, beyond commenting on the frequency and length of meetings. Through semi-structured interviews, informal discussions with colleagues and students, a critical review of literature and personal reflection, this paper explores the salience of coffee for postgraduate supervision. This paper locates supervisions over coffee in reference to contemporary debates about the supervisory relationship (models, styles, tasks and dimensions). Using the concept of ‘third places’ and Misztal's theorisation of informality, it is argued that supervision over coffee conveys a particular supervisory relationship to postgraduate students: one that is incompatible with expert-disciple models or styles of supervision. Instead, supervision over coffee is on neutral territory and on a more informal footing. Finally the paper concludes with discussion about finding a balance between formality and informality in supervision and the development of personal and institutional trust.View full textDownload full textKeywordsformality, higher degree supervision, supervisory meetings, supervisory relationships, third placesRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2012.674011
机译：近年来，很多文献都集中在监督关系上，但是除了评论会议的频率和时间以外，关于监督会议的性质或内容的文献很少。通过半结构化访谈，与同事和学生的非正式讨论，对文学和个人反思的批判性评论，本文探索了咖啡对研究生监督的重要性。本文参考有关监管关系（模型，样式，任务和尺寸）的当代争论来定位对咖啡的监管。利用“第三名”的概念和米斯达尔的非正式性理论，有人认为对咖啡的监督向研究生传达了一种特殊的监督关系：一种与专家学科模式或监督方式不相容的关系。取而代之的是，对咖啡的监管是在中立的领域和更加非正式的基础上进行的。最后，本文最后讨论了如何在监督的形式和非正式之间以及个人和机构信任的发展之间寻求平衡。查看全文下载全文关键字形式，高级监督，监督会议，监督关系，第三名相关变量var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand：“泰勒和弗朗西斯在线”，services_compact：“ citeulike，netvibes，twitter，technorati，delicious，linkedin，facebook，stumbleupon，digg，google，更多”，发布号：“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2012.674011

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号