...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Housing, theory and society >Governing Through Locational Choice: the Locational Preferences of Rural Public Housing Tenants in South-Western New South Wales, Australia
【24h】

Governing Through Locational Choice: the Locational Preferences of Rural Public Housing Tenants in South-Western New South Wales, Australia

机译：通过位置选择进行治理：澳大利亚新南威尔士州西南部农村公共住房租户的位置偏好

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The state provision of housing assistance often fulfils goals in addition to that of providing citizens with affordable shelter. With a broad shift to advanced liberal governmental strategies, both housing and regional development policies construct governmental strategies that promote locationally flexible responses as appropriate means of adjustment to regional change and locational disadvantage. Using a survey and interviews conducted with public housing tenants from four towns in south-western rural New South Wales, this paper builds on the governmentality literature in housing studies that has emerged over the last five years and explores the potential locational preferences of housing assistance recipients. In particular it investigates whether rural public housing tenants were likely to become more mobile/locationally flexible with greater locational choice and to analyse how "economically rational" these locational preferences would be. The paper finds that while a majority of tenants indicated a preparedness to become locationally flexible, these preferences were not influenced predominantly by economically rational factors. Likewise, at a regional scale, a majority of tenants indicated a preference for rural areas, with their discourses exhibiting country-minded attitudes and a strong attachment to place. The paper concludes with the reflection that the use of "choice" as a technology of government is unlikely to produce the economically rational, locationally flexible responses that policymakers pursue as a means of addressing regional disadvantage. Instead, such governmental processes are likely to be hindered by other non-economic factors that remain as strong influences in how individuals come to their locational preferences.
机译：除了为公民提供负担得起的住所之外，国家提供住房援助通常还可以实现目标。随着广泛转向先进的自由政府战略，住房和区域发展政策都构建了政府战略，这些战略促进了对地区的灵活反应，作为适应地区变化和地区不利条件的适当手段。通过对来自新南威尔士州西南农村地区四个城镇的公共住房承租人的调查和访谈，本文以过去五年中出现的有关住房研究的政府性文献为基础，并探讨了住房援助接受者的潜在地理位置偏好。特别是，它调查了农村公共住房承租人是否可能随着更大的位置选择而变得更具流动性/位置灵活性，并分析了这些位置偏好在经济上的合理程度。该论文发现，尽管大多数租户都表示有准备变得位置灵活，但这些偏好并未受到经济上合理因素的主要影响。同样，在区域范围内，大多数租户表示偏爱农村地区，他们的话语表现出国家意识的态度和对地方的强烈依恋。本文的结论是，“选择”作为一种政府技术的使用不太可能产生经济上合理的，位置上灵活的反应，决策者们将这种反应作为解决区域劣势的一种手段。相反，这样的政府程序可能会受到其他非经济因素的阻碍，这些因素仍然对个人如何选择其地理位置产生了很大的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号