...
首页> 外文期刊>Human Resources 21 >Decision - If You Were The Judge...
【24h】

Decision - If You Were The Judge...

机译:决定-如果您是法官...

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

No, Beatrice didn't win her ADA lawsuit. The court wouldn't let it go to trial, and threw it out. It's true that an employer, if given reasonable notice that an employee may have a disability, is supposed to dialogue with the employee over a possible accommodation. And it's also true that the company didn't do that here. But the court said it didn't have to. Beatrice didn't give any reasonable notice that she thought her depression was disabling. A mere comment about "trouble with her medication" was hardly enough to put the company on notice, and the unamplified statement that she might have to "miss a day here or there" wasn't a request for accommodation.
机译:不,比阿特丽斯(Beatrice)没有赢得她的ADA诉讼。法院不会让它去审判,并把它扔出去。的确,如果雇主合理地通知员工可能患有残疾,则应该与该员工就可能的住宿条件进行对话。而且公司确实没有在这里这样做。但是法院表示没有必要。比阿特丽斯(Beatrice)没有给出任何合理的通知,认为她的抑郁症正在致残。仅仅对“她的药物麻烦”的评论不足以引起公司的注意,而未经简化的声明她可能不得不“在这里或那里错过一天”并没有得到住宿的要求。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Human Resources 21》 |2008年第12期|p.8|共1页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 企业经济;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号