Daily Document Update: HR Compliance Library, ¶35,393, U.S. Supreme Court rules auto dealership service advisors are overtime-exempt; FLSA exemptions need not be ‘narrowly construed’ - US SUPREME COURT DOCKET, (Apr. 4, 2018)

首页> 外文期刊>Human resources management >Daily Document Update: HR Compliance Library, ¶35,393, U.S. Supreme Court rules auto dealership service advisors are overtime-exempt; FLSA exemptions need not be ‘narrowly construed’ - US SUPREME COURT DOCKET, (Apr. 4, 2018)

【24h】

Daily Document Update: HR Compliance Library, ¶35,393, U.S. Supreme Court rules auto dealership service advisors are overtime-exempt; FLSA exemptions need not be ‘narrowly construed’ - US SUPREME COURT DOCKET, (Apr. 4, 2018)

机译：每日文件更新：《人力资源合规图书馆》，美国最高法院¶35,393，规定汽车经销服务顾问可加班。 FLSA豁免无需“狭义解释”-美国最高法院对决（2018年4月4日）

获取原文

获取原文并翻译 | 示例

掌桥外文数据库（机构版） >>

开具论文收录证明 >>

文献代查 >>

页面导航

摘要
著录项
相似文献
相关主题

摘要

An auto dealership’s service advisors, "who consult with customers about their servicing needs and sell themrnservicing solutions," are exempt from overtime under the FLSA, the U.S. Supreme Court held, taking on thisrnNinth Circuit case for a second time in a decision authored by Justice Thomas. The exemption in question, setrnforth in Section 213(b)(10)(A), applies to "any salesman, partsman, or mechanic primarily engaged in selling orrnservicing automobiles, trucks, or farm implements." Service advisors "obviously" are salesmen, Thomas wrote,rnand they service automobiles. Therefore, they are covered. The esoteric FLSA exemption issue sharply dividedrnthe Justices, who resolved the dispute in a 5-4 decision. But the bigger story here—the implications of whichrnmay be seismic for wage-hour litigation—is the majority’s overt rejection of the notion that exemptions to thernFLSA are to be narrowly construed. It did so, Justice Ginsburg’s dissent decried in a footnote, without evenrn"acknowledging that it unsettles more than half a century of our precedent" (Encino Motorcars, LLC v. Navarro,rnApril 2, 2018, Thomas, C.).

机译：汽车经销店的服务顾问“向客户咨询他们的维修需求并出售他们的维修解决方案”，根据美国最高法院在FLSA上的裁决，免于加班。托马斯。该豁免在第213（b）（10）（A）条中作了规定，适用于“任何主要从事汽车，卡车或农具维修服务的销售员，零件销售员或机械师”。托马斯写道，服务顾问“显然”是推销员，他们为汽车服务。因此，它们被覆盖。神秘的FLSA豁免问题使法官大为分歧，后者以5-4的决定解决了争端。但是，这里更大的故事（对于工资工时诉讼可能产生深远的影响）是大多数人公开拒绝对thrnFLSA的豁免进行狭义解释的观点。这样做是因为，金斯堡大法官的异议在一个脚注中遭到谴责，但却没有“承认这使我们的先例有超过半个世纪的历史”（Encino Motorcars，LLC诉Navarro，2018年4月2日，Thomas，C.）。

著录项

来源
《Human resources management》 |2018年第4期|1-2|共2页
作者

展开▼
作者单位

展开▼
收录信息
原文格式 PDF
正文语种 eng
中图分类
关键词

相似文献

外文文献

1. Daily Document Update: HR Compliance Library, ¶46,052, Supreme Court Justices will rule on Title VII’s reach to sexual orientation and gender identity - US SUPREME COURT DOCKET, (Apr. 23, 2019) [J] . Human resources management . 2019,第APRa23期

机译：每日文件更新：HR合规性库，¶46,052，最高法院法官将裁定VII标题涉及性取向和性别认同-US SUPREME COURT DOCKET（2019年4月23日）
2. Daily Document Update: HR Compliance Library, ¶46,052, Supreme Court Justices will rule on Title VII’s reach to sexual orientation and gender identity - US SUPREME COURT DOCKET, (Apr. 23, 2019) [J] . Human resources management . 2019,第Apra23期

机译：每日文件更新：人力资源合规图书馆，¶46,052，最高法院法官将统治第七次达到性取向和性别认同 - 美国最高法院唐克特（2019年4月23日）
3. Daily Document Update: HR Compliance Library, ¶45,057, Citing importance of ‘consent’, Supreme Court finds ambiguous contract can’t support class arbitration - US SUPREME COURT DOCKET, (Apr. 25, 2019) [J] . Human resources management . 2019,第APRa25期

机译：每日文件更新：《人力资源合规图书馆》，¶45,057，“同意”的重要性，最高法院裁定模棱两可的合同不支持集体仲裁-美国最高法院对决（2019年4月25日）
4. Construing the Uniform Division of Income for Tax Purposes Act: Reflections on the Illinois Supreme Courts Reading of the \u22Throwback\u22 Rule [O] . Hellerstein, Walter 1978

机译：为税收目的而建立统一的收入分割法：对伊利诺伊州最高法院对\ u22Throwback \ u22规则的解读的思考

Daily Document Update: HR Compliance Library, ¶35,393, U.S. Supreme Court rules auto dealership service advisors are overtime-exempt; FLSA exemptions need not be ‘narrowly construed’ - US SUPREME COURT DOCKET, (Apr. 4, 2018)

摘要

著录项

相似文献

相关主题

期刊订阅