首页> 外文期刊>Information Communication & Society >From media technologies to mediated events: a different settlement between media studies and science and technology studies
【24h】

From media technologies to mediated events: a different settlement between media studies and science and technology studies

机译:从媒体技术到媒体事件:媒体研究与科学技术研究之间的不同解决

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

There have been many recent attempts to bring insights from science and technology studies (STS) into media disciplines, many of which associate this work with materiality and technology, while existing media theories are used to analyse the domain of media content and political economy. While this is a reasonable settlement, in this paper I will suggest an alternative arrangement based around controversies. Controversies, and related empirical objects, can help break down dichotomies like producer/audience, social/technical, content/material and also provoke questions such as which media technologies matter in a given case?' However, controversies are often specific to science so I propose a type of study based around mediated events' (drawing on the work of Isabelle Stengers). I illustrate this with the case of the Woolwich attacks on Twitter. While this approach does not deliver a comprehensive theory of the media, it proposes a new settlement between STS and media studies, grounded in the empirical rather than high theory.
机译:最近有许多尝试将科学技术研究(STS)的见解带入媒体学科,其中许多将这项工作与物质性和技术联系在一起,而现有的媒体理论则用于分析媒体内容和政治经济学的领域。尽管这是一个合理的解决方案,但在本文中,我将根据争议提出另一种安排。争议和相关的经验对象可以帮助分解生产者/受众,社会/技术,内容/材料等二分法,还可以引发问题,例如在特定情况下哪种媒体技术至关重要?但是,争议通常是特定于科学的,因此我提出了一种基于中介事件的研究(借鉴了Isabelle Stengers的作品)。我以Twitter上的Woolwich攻击为例说明了这一点。尽管这种方法并未提供完整的媒体理论,但它提出了STS与媒体研究之间的新解决方案,其基础是经验主义而非高级理论。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号