...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Information and software technology >Exploring ScrumBut-An empirical study of Scrum anti-patterns
【24h】

Exploring ScrumBut-An empirical study of Scrum anti-patterns

机译：探索Scrum但是-Scrum反模式的实证研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The wide-spread adoption of the agile movement has rapidly changed the landscape of software industry. In particular, Scrum is an agile process framework that has become extremely popular in industry. However, the practical implementation of Scrum in companies rarely follows the text book ideals, as companies often deviate from the proposed Scrum practices for various reasons. While some deviations may be well motivated and reasonable, companies can also be tempted to adjust Scrum for the company without clearly understanding the consequences of the deviations. In this paper our aim is to identify ways of potentially harmful mishandling of Scrum in industry based on empirical data collected in semi-structured interviews involving 18 teams in 11 companies. The (mal)practices that were identified at least in three different teams are presented in a semi-formal manner as anti-patterns. The study resulted in 14 anti-patterns that express the context of the deviation, the deviation itself, the broken core principles of Scrum, and the possible consequences of the deviation. In addition, where available, we have included company recommendations regarding the deviations. Furthermore, we identify potential risk areas in Scrum based on an analysis of the relationships between anti-patterns and Scrum concepts. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译：敏捷运动的广泛采用迅速改变了软件行业的面貌。特别是，Scrum是一种敏捷过程框架，在行业中已变得非常流行。但是，由于公司由于各种原因经常偏离拟议的Scrum实践，因此在公司中实际实施Scrum很少遵循教科书的理想。尽管有些偏差可能是出于积极动机和合理的，但公司也可能会在没有清楚了解偏差后果的情况下，为公司调整Scrum。在本文中，我们的目的是根据在涉及11家公司的18个团队的半结构化访谈中收集的经验数据，确定行业内对Scrum的潜在有害处理不当的方式。至少在三个不同的团队中确定的（错误）做法以半正式的形式提出为反模式。该研究产生了14种反模式，这些模式表达了偏离的背景，偏离本身，Scrum的核心原则被打破以及偏离的可能后果。此外，在可能的情况下，我们还提供了有关偏差的公司建议。此外，我们通过分析反模式与Scrum概念之间的关系来确定Scrum中的潜在风险区域。 （C）2015 Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号