...
首页> 外文期刊>International journal of constitutional law >Judicial institutions, the legitimacy of Islamic state law and democratic transition in Egypt: Can a shift toward a common law model of adjudication improve the prospects of a successful democratic transition?
【24h】

Judicial institutions, the legitimacy of Islamic state law and democratic transition in Egypt: Can a shift toward a common law model of adjudication improve the prospects of a successful democratic transition?

机译:司法机构,伊斯兰国家法的合法性和埃及的民主过渡:向普通法审判模式的转变能否改善成功民主过渡的前景?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Egyptian law has undergone radical institutional change over the last 150 years, evolving from a decentralized system of largely uncodified Islamic law, into a highly centralized, posi-tivist system modeled along the civil law system of France. The last quarter of the nineteenth century witnessed the wholesale adoption of European law, including the Napoleonic Code. After regaining independence, however, the Egyptian legal system has been steadily attempting to re-Islamize itself, beginning with the Sanhuri Code that replaced the Napoleonic Code in 1949 and the adoption of Article 2 in the Constitution in 1980 recognizing the Shari'a as the source of legislation for the Egyptian state.
机译:在过去的150年中,埃及法律发生了根本性的制度变化,从分散的,基本上未编纂的伊斯兰法体系演变为以法国的民法体系为蓝本的高度集中的,积极主义的体系。十九世纪下半叶见证了包括拿破仑法典在内的欧洲法律的全面采用。然而,在重新获得独立之后,埃及的法律体系一直在稳步尝试重新伊斯兰化,从1949年取代《拿破仑法典》的《桑胡里法典》和1980年通过的《宪法》第2条承认伊斯兰教法为伊斯兰教法。埃及国家立法的来源。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号