...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>International journal of constitutional law >Strategic considerations behind normative explanations: Lessons from Israel's Supreme Court expropriations case
【24h】

Strategic considerations behind normative explanations: Lessons from Israel's Supreme Court expropriations case

机译：规范性解释背后的战略考虑：以色列最高法院没收案的教训

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

In a key expropriations law case, the Israeli Supreme Court enunciated a revolutionary constitutional meta-principle but voluntarily refrained from applying it in the concrete case and instead it charged the legislature with the task of giving it a detailed legislative expression. The result of the Court's move was a subversion of its own fundamental ruling and delayed justice for the parties. The article argues that the Court's exceptional behavior was guided by two alternative covert strategic considerations rather than by its overt normative explanation. The first was a compromise among the judges in light of an internal dispute. The second was the consideration of the implications of the decision for the public support of the Court. The overall conclusion is that, ultimately, strategic considerations do influence courts, and courts even draw strategic lessons. While courts do not often leave clear direct traces of their strategic considerations, conclusions about this type of considerations may be drawn from the circumstantial evidence that they do leave.
机译：在一个关键的没收法律案件中，以色列最高法院宣布了一项革命性的宪法元原则，但自愿避免在具体案件中应用该原则，而是责成立法机关赋予其详细的立法表达的任务。法院此举的结果是对法院本身基本裁决的颠覆，并拖延了当事方的正义。文章认为，法院的特殊行为是由两种替代性的隐性战略考虑指导的，而不是由其公开的规范性解释指导的。首先是鉴于内部纠纷，法官之间的妥协。第二是审议该决定对法院公众支持的影响。总的结论是，战略考虑最终会影响法院，甚至法院也会汲取战略教训。尽管法院通常不会留下直接考虑其战略考虑的直接痕迹，但有关此类考虑的结论可能是从他们确实离开的间接证据中得出的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号