...
首页> 外文期刊>International journal of constitutional law >Strategic considerations behind normative explanations: Lessons from Israel's Supreme Court expropriations case: A rejoinder to Barak Medina
【24h】

Strategic considerations behind normative explanations: Lessons from Israel's Supreme Court expropriations case: A rejoinder to Barak Medina

机译:规范性解释背后的战略考虑:以色列最高法院没收案的教训:巴拉克·麦地那的再见

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In my article on the Israeli Karsik case, I claimed that covert strategic considerations influenced the Israeli Supreme Court ruling. Although the Court ruled that, "in principle," upon the termination of a public purpose, the land that had been expropriated from its owners should be returned to them, it refrained entirely from deciding this and other cases, leaving the implementation of the decision up to the legislature.
机译:我在关于以色列卡西克案的文章中声称,隐秘的战略考虑影响了以色列最高法院的裁决。尽管法院裁定“原则上”在公共目的终止后,应将归其所有者征用的土地归还给他们,但法院完全没有决定本案和其他案件,从而使该决定得以执行由立法机关决定。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号