Applicability of doctrine of equivalent and prosecution history estoppels in Indian patent system

Tapas Bandyopadhyay; Tuhin Singharoy

首页> 外文期刊>International journal of intellectual property management >Applicability of doctrine of equivalent and prosecution history estoppels in Indian patent system

【24h】

Applicability of doctrine of equivalent and prosecution history estoppels in Indian patent system

机译：等效和起诉历史禁止原则在印度专利制度中的适用性

获取原文

获取原文并翻译 | 示例

掌桥外文数据库（机构版） >>

开具论文收录证明 >>

文献代查 >>

页面导航

摘要
著录项
相似文献
相关主题

摘要

The doctrine of equivalent, prosecution history estoppels and their interrelationship has been well discussed by various decisions in US jurisdiction. But what is the approach of Indian patent office, and Indian court in an issue same or similar to that. Is the prosecution history estoppels applicable in Indian patent system or thought can be extended to that direction? The present paper has analysed the concept of 'doctrine of equivalent' and 'prosecution history estoppels' based on some US court judgments and tried to extend its applicability in Indian patent system.

机译：美国司法管辖区的各种裁决已充分讨论了等同的起诉历史禁止的原则及其相互关系。但是印度专利局和印度法院在与之相同或相似的问题上的处理方式是什么。起诉历史禁止反言是否适用于印度专利制度或思想可以扩展到该方向？本文根据美国一些法院的判决分析了“等同原则”和“起诉历史禁止反言”的概念，并试图扩大其在印度专利制度中的适用性。

著录项

来源
《International journal of intellectual property management》 |2012年第2期|p.162-168|共7页
作者
Tapas Bandyopadhyay; Tuhin Singharoy;
展开▼
作者单位

RGSOIPL, IIT-Kharagpur, Kharagpur-721302, India;

RGSOIPL, IIT-Kharagpur, Kharagpur-721302, India;

展开▼
收录信息
原文格式 PDF
正文语种 eng
中图分类
关键词
doctrine; equivalent; prosecution; patent; jurisdiction; purposive; infringement; literal; claim; estoppels;

机译：教义;当量;起诉专利;管辖权;目的的侵权;文字;要求;禁止反言;

相似文献

外文文献
中文文献
专利

1. Doctrine of equivalents in Japan - criteria of special conditions and estoppel: final conclusion [J] . Takeshi S Komatani Pharmaceutical patent analyst . 2017,第5a6期

机译：日本等同物的学说 - 特殊条件和estoppel的标准：最终结论
2. Doctrine of equivalents in Japan: criteria of special conditions and estoppel [J] . Takeshi S Komatani Pharmaceutical patent analyst . 2016,第3期

机译：日本的等效学说：特殊条件和禁止反言的标准
3. Korean High Court Clarifies Prosecution History Estoppel Analysis [J] . Hyewon Lee World intellectual property report . 2017,第8期

机译：韩国高等法院澄清起诉历史禁止反言分析
4. U.S. PATENTS IN THE WAKE OF CHANGES TO THE DOCTRINE OF EQUIVALENTS [C] . Paul A. Serbinowski ASM International Surface Engineering Congress . 2003

机译：美国专利在对等同物学说的变化之后
5. Indian Country Criminal Justice, the Dual-Sovereignty Doctrine, and Best Practices for Curbing Multiple Prosecutions [D] . Thompson, Sarah Glenn. 2020

机译：印度国家刑事司法，双重主权主义，以及遏制多次起诉的最佳实践
6. Indian pharmaceutical patent prosecution: The changing role of Section 3(d) [O] . Bhaven N. Sampat, Kenneth C. Shadlen -1

机译：印度制药专利诉讼：第3（d）节的角色变化
7. Patent Drafter Estoppel: Why Didnu27t Sage Products Create a New Foreseeability Limitation on the Application of the Doctrine of Equivalents? [O] . Kaiser Christopher M 2006

机译：专利起草人禁止反言：为什么鼠尾草产品在等效原则的应用上没有创造新的可预见性限制？
8. Mercy Killings in Combat: Ending the Suffering of Gravely Wounded Combatants -- A Brief History, Applicable Law, Recent Prosecutions, and Proposals for Much Needed Change [R] . Helixon, W. M. 2006

机译：战斗中的怜悯杀戮：结束严重受伤的战斗人员的痛苦 - 简史，适用法律，最近的起诉以及对需求变化的建议

Applicability of doctrine of equivalent and prosecution history estoppels in Indian patent system

摘要

著录项

相似文献

相关主题

期刊订阅