• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>International journal of learning and intellectual capital >Scientific progress in strategic management: the case of the resource-based view
【24h】

Scientific progress in strategic management: the case of the resource-based view

机译：战略管理的科学进步：基于资源的观点

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Does the Resource-Based View (RBV) represent a case of scientific progress? And has it emerged as the dominant approach to the understanding of competitive advantage for this reason? Conventional criteria for scientific progress, notably those of the growth of knowledge literature, are not particularly helpful for understanding this. Instead, it is argued that in order to understand why the RBV is an instance of scientific progress, we should begin from the notion that reduction is at the heart of progress in science, and that many scientists implicitly or explicitly hold this view. The RBV is a case of scientific progress because it identified theoretical mechanisms at levels lower than those that were usually investigated in strategy research prior to the RBV. Unfortunately, the micro-emphasis of the RBV gave way during the 1990s to more aggregative modes of theorising (i.e., the capabilities approach). Thus, the RBV represents an 'unfinished revolution' as there is still considerable potential to dig deeper in the deep structure of competitive advantage.
机译：基于资源的视图（RBV）是否代表科学进步的案例？由于这个原因，它是否已成为理解竞争优势的主要方法？科学进步的常规标准，特别是知识文献增长的常规标准，对于理解这一点并没有特别帮助。相反，有人争辩说，为了理解为什么RBV是科学进步的一个实例，我们应该从这样的观念开始，即减少是科学进步的核心，许多科学家暗中或明确地持有这种观点。 RBV是科学进步的一个案例，因为它确定的理论机制的水平低于RBV之前在战略研究中通常研究的水平。不幸的是，RBV的微观重点在1990年代逐渐转向了更具聚合性的理论模式（即能力方法）。因此，RBV代表着“未完成的革命”，因为仍有相当大的潜力来深入挖掘竞争优势的深层结构。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号