• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>International journal of marine and coastal law >The Maritime Border Areas of Ireland, North and South: An Assessment of Present Jurisdictional Ambiguities and International Precedents Relating to Delimitation of 'Border Bays'
【24h】

The Maritime Border Areas of Ireland, North and South: An Assessment of Present Jurisdictional Ambiguities and International Precedents Relating to Delimitation of 'Border Bays'

机译：爱尔兰，北部和南部的海上边界地区：对与“边界湾”划界有关的现行管辖权歧义和国际判例的评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Since the time of Partition of the island of Ireland in the 1920s, there have, for good political reasons (such as particularly the pre-Belfast Agreement Irish claim to all the territorial waters around Northern Ireland), been no agreed international maritime boundaries between either jurisdiction North or South: either in the two border bays lying to the north-west and northeast of the land boundary (Lough Foyle and Carlingford Lough, respectively) or in regard to the lateral boundaries extending further seawards from these loughs. Nor have any official closing lines been agreed to indicate that the two border bays contain internal waters. The past lack of maritime boundaries has been mitigated in the more recent past by the unique cross-border jurisdiction relating to fisheries in Lough Foyle from 1952, as now extended under the Belfast Agreement to Carlingford Lough, through the enhanced joint regime administered through the Loughs Agency (part of a North-South body). However, for other jurisdictional purposes, such as criminal law enforcement, security, and planning aspects for marine uses such as windfarming, the lack of territorial sea/internal waters boundaries has led to Anglo-Irish problems and jurisdictional vacuums. This article looks at the past and present of such jurisdictional problems-including those relating to the new Loughs Agency-in the light of border bay precedents elsewhere in the world, and suggests maritime boundary solutions which might be mutually adopted.
机译：自1920年代对爱尔兰岛进行分区以来，出于良好的政治原因（例如特别是《贝尔法斯特协定》签署之前，爱尔兰宣称对北爱尔兰周围的所有领海进行了管制），两者之间都没有达成商定的国际海洋边界管辖权的北部或南部：位于陆地边界的西北和东北的两个边界湾（分别为福伊尔湖和卡林福德湖），或从这些湖向海延伸的横向边界。也没有商定任何正式的封闭线以表明两个边界湾内有水。自1952年以来，与拉夫福伊尔州渔业有关的独特跨境管辖权（根据《贝尔法斯特协定》现在已扩展到卡林福德拉夫）通过加强由拉夫斯管理的联合政权而得到缓解，过去的海洋边界得到了缓解。代理商（南北机构的一部分）。但是，出于其他管辖权目的，例如刑事执法，安全和海洋用途的规划方面（例如风电场），缺少领海/内部水域边界导致了盎格鲁爱尔兰问题和管辖权真空。本文根据世界其他地方的边界湾先例，探讨了此类管辖权问题的过去和现在，包括与新的Loughs机构有关的管辖权问题，并提出了可以相互采用的海洋边界解决方案。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号